Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44971 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2011 16:20:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2011 16:20:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 20503 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 16:20:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20222 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2011 16:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 20208 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2011 16:20:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:20:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:20:06 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p0OGJjAP014871 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:19:46 GMT Message-ID: <12249553.158121295885985901.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:19:45 -0500 (EST) From: "stack (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-3374) Our jruby jar has *GPL jars in it; fix In-Reply-To: <13386825.198991292739360731.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12985781#action_12985781 ] stack commented on HBASE-3374: ------------------------------ @Charles Yes, CDDL looks fine. We can add appropriate notices np. Thanks for taking this on. > Our jruby jar has *GPL jars in it; fix > -------------------------------------- > > Key: HBASE-3374 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3374 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: stack > Fix For: 0.90.1, 0.92.0 > > Attachments: jruby.txt > > > The latest JRuby's complete jar bundles *GPL jars (JNA and JFFI among others). It looks like the functionality we depend on -- the shell in particular -- makes use of these dirty jars so they are hard to strip. They came in because we (I!) just updated our JRuby w/o checking in on what updates contained. JRuby has been doing this for a while now (1.1.x added the first LGPL). You have to go all the ways back to the original HBase checkin, HBASE-487, of JRuby -- 1.0.3 -- to get a JRuby w/o *GPL jars. > Plan is to try and revert our JRuby all the ways down to 1.0.3 before shipping 0.90.0. Thats what this issue is about. > We should also look into moving off JRuby in the medium to long-term. Its kinda awkward sticking on an old version that is no longer supported. I'll open an issue for that. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.