hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Resolved: (HBASE-3311) Addendum patch on HBASE-3298 broke buid
Date Sun, 05 Dec 2010 04:53:10 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

stack resolved HBASE-3311.
--------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Ok I applied this.  Let hudson say if its right or not.

> Addendum patch on HBASE-3298 broke buid
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3311
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>         Attachments: 3311.txt
>
>
> Our addendum patch on HBASE-3298 removed reassign if an unassign failed; it makes no
sense doing an assign on failed unassign -- it makes for double-assign (at least, reasoning
through the possible failures, i can't find case where we'd want to assign on failed unassign).
 Well, TestMasterFailover depended on this behavior.  Its the test that exercises all of this
zk stuff.  It tries its best to manufacture messy scenarios.  One scenario adds a PENDING_CLOSE
but it doesn't have an associated server.  A null server was returning a 'false' when we tried
to do the close rpc which would fall into the since removed reassign code -- which would pick
up a server, and the test would go on to succeed.
> Removing reassign on unassign broke this.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message