Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <28415426.34561287449067178.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:44:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: "ryan rawson (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1845) MultiGet, MultiDelete, and MultiPut
 - batched to the appropriate region servers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12922385#action_12922385 ] 

ryan rawson commented on HBASE-1845:
------------------------------------

an addition to this issue, the as-is unit test was testing the order of mixed-operations, in that they were applied in the order they were provided.  That is not realistic, especially if we want to implement HBASE-2985, which does the Puts last in 1 batch.  The regionserver should not be constrained to the most optimal order of operations by the API. 

> MultiGet, MultiDelete, and MultiPut - batched to the appropriate region servers
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Erik Holstad
>            Assignee: Marc Limotte
>             Fix For: 0.90.0
>
>         Attachments: batch.patch, hbase-1845-trunk.patch, hbase-1845_0.20.3.patch, hbase-1845_0.20.5.patch, multi-v1.patch
>
>
> I've started to create a general interface for doing these batch/multi calls and would like to get some input and thoughts about how we should handle this and what the protocol should
> look like. 
> First naive patch, coming soon.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.