Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37885 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2010 01:07:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Jun 2010 01:07:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 13460 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 01:07:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-issues-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13421 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2010 01:07:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list issues@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13413 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jun 2010 01:07:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:07:37 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.22] (HELO thor.apache.org) (140.211.11.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:07:35 +0000 Received: from thor (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thor.apache.org (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5F17DH7003961 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:07:14 GMT Message-ID: <27442759.89941276564033812.JavaMail.jira@thor> Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:07:13 -0400 (EDT) From: "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" To: issues@hbase.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2728) Support for HADOOP-4829 In-Reply-To: <18281149.89481276562294750.JavaMail.jira@thor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878819#action_12878819 ] Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-2728: ------------------------------------ Here's a thought. What if we did something like: FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf); fs.close(); fs = FileSystem.get(conf); // now we know we have a fresh instance? Or, if we're certain we always get the filesystem instance from this var, we could use FileSystem.newInstance? My only nervousness is that this might break again and we wouldn't notice (since we don't seem to have any good unit tests for it) > Support for HADOOP-4829 > ----------------------- > > Key: HBASE-2728 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2728 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans > Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans > Fix For: 0.20.6 > > Attachments: HBASE-2728.patch > > > Users who have a HADOOP-4829 patched hadoop will run into the issue that closing a RS cleanly result into data loss because the FileSystem will be closed before the regions are. Cloudera is an example. We need to support those users. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.