Mailing-List: contact issues-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <21354438.26681276010717312.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:25:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc Limotte (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: issues@hbase.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Commented: (HBASE-1845) MultiGet, MultiDelete, and MultiPut
 - batched to the appropriate region servers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12876698#action_12876698 ] 

Marc Limotte commented on HBASE-1845:
-------------------------------------

I think you're right that you could accomplish some of the same things with the Scan/Filter semantics.  Multi has a couple of additional capabilities.

Scan is limited to one table.  Multi can do Gets from lots of different tables.  This applies to families or columns, too.

Second, Multi lets you mix and match Get, Put and Delete.  It's not clear to me how often that will happen, but it's there.


> MultiGet, MultiDelete, and MultiPut - batched to the appropriate region servers
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-1845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1845
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Erik Holstad
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>         Attachments: batch.patch, hbase-1845_0.20.3.patch, hbase-1845_0.20.5.patch, multi-v1.patch
>
>
> I've started to create a general interface for doing these batch/multi calls and would like to get some input and thoughts about how we should handle this and what the protocol should
> look like. 
> First naive patch, coming soon.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.