hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "stack (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2236) Upper bound of outstanding WALs can be overrun; take 2 (take 1 was hbase-2053)
Date Sat, 12 Jun 2010 04:47:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878211#action_12878211

stack commented on HBASE-2236:

This bug is already marked critical.  I think it is.  Was at a user site today where hdfs
was yanked from under hbase.  Each server had 15-20 logs to proces... some even more.  We
need to be more aggressive about cleaning up old logs.  

> Upper bound of outstanding WALs can be overrun; take 2 (take 1 was hbase-2053)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-2236
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2236
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: stack
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.21.0
> So hbase-2053 is not aggressive enough.  WALs can still overwhelm the upper limit on
log count.  While the code added by HBASE-2053, when done, will ensure we let go of the oldest
WAL, to do it, we might have to flush many regions.  E.g:
> {code}
> 2010-02-15 14:20:29,351 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HLog: Too many hlogs:
logs=45, maxlogs=32; forcing flush of 5 regions(s): test1,193717,1266095474624, test1,194375,1266108228663,
test1,195690,1266095539377, test1,196348,1266095539377, test1,197939,1266069173999
> {code}
> This takes time.  If we are taking on edits a furious rate, we might have rolled the
log again, meantime, maybe more than once.
> Also log rolls happen inline with a put/delete as soon as it hits the 64MB (default)
boundary whereas the necessary flushing is done in background by a single thread and the memstore
can overrun the (default) 64MB size.  Flushes needed to release logs will be mixed in with
"natural" flushes as memstores fill.  Flushes may take longer than the writing of an HLog
because they can be larger.
> So, on an RS that is struggling the tendency would seem to be for a slight rise in WALs.
 Only if the RS gets a breather will the flusher catch up.
> If HBASE-2087 happens, then the count of WALs get a boost.
> Ideas to fix this for good would be :
> + Priority queue for queuing up flushes with those that are queued to free up WALs having
> + Improve the HBASE-2053 code so that it will free more than just the last WAL, maybe
even queuing flushes so we clear all WALs such that we are back under the maximum WALS threshold

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message