hbase-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (HBASE-2728) Support for HADOOP-4829
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:07:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878819#action_12878819

Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-2728:

Here's a thought. What if we did something like:
FileSystem fs = FileSystem.get(conf);
fs = FileSystem.get(conf); // now we know we have a fresh instance?

Or, if we're certain we always get the filesystem instance from this var, we could use FileSystem.newInstance?

My only nervousness is that this might break again and we wouldn't notice (since we don't
seem to have any good unit tests for it)

> Support for HADOOP-4829
> -----------------------
>                 Key: HBASE-2728
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2728
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>            Assignee: Jean-Daniel Cryans
>             Fix For: 0.20.6
>         Attachments: HBASE-2728.patch
> Users who have a HADOOP-4829 patched hadoop will run into the issue that closing a RS
cleanly result into data loss because the FileSystem will be closed before the regions are.
Cloudera is an example. We need to support those users.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

View raw message