From dev-return-79548-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hbase.apache.org Fri May 29 20:49:27 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E4AA918062B for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 22:49:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 37347 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2020 20:49:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 37335 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2020 20:49:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) (10.10.3.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 May 2020 20:49:25 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49]) by mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 4CC0E1005 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 20:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id e125so515160lfd.1 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:49:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532f77MLuQeBM+Hl18RE8KtlBhjzivCmrmBAmpSqulVTGOakDZ8J ixn7VUeZsCtM9R8barhg3CAGAYX2hzj9FEo1j5o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFUSezBKFkrp19s1+cgYjJcofxYo3+HCzZ3IsLjklNvYo9aWCZUctvOnug08La1tiWQFKbQ4dzvdSU+WiLODU= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:4286:: with SMTP id m6mr5293978lfh.84.1590785364298; Fri, 29 May 2020 13:49:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Nick Dimiduk Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 13:49:07 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Separate web access logs To: hbase-dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d92aa05a6cf94c6" --0000000000008d92aa05a6cf94c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry Duo, I missed your reply. Yes, I think that's fine with me. We can change the default log4j to silence this logger by default and include commented guidance for enabling it. On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 7:08 PM =E5=BC=A0=E9=93=8E(Duo Zhang) wrote: > For now the default config is just disable the access log? > > No sure if it is useful to output these access logs as for me I do not ca= re > the access to status pages too much... > > Nick Dimiduk =E4=BA=8E2020=E5=B9=B45=E6=9C=8814=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=886:20=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > > Having read through a region server log with this feature enabled, > looking > > to diagnose another issue, I'm going to change my tone. I think having > > these messages in the standard server log is too noisy, makes them even > > harder to read. In my case, it looks like automation is pinging the /jm= x > > endpoint on a regular basis, and we're seeing those interaction here. > > > > So, I propose we change the default configuration to ship these logs to= a > > dedicated access.log. > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:41 PM Nick Dimiduk > wrote: > > > > > Heya, > > > > > > Looks like since HBASE-24310 we have nicely formatted logs of access = to > > > our WebUI endpoints, following a standard web server log format. I > think > > > it'll be a common requirement for environments to process these logs > > > following standard processes for web servers, so I think we should > > document > > > how to separate them out to their own dedicated file, thus HBASE-2436= 6. > > > However, I'm wondering if we should make the separate file as the > default > > > configuration. Are there different answers to this question for 2.x v= s. > > 3.0 > > > releases? > > > > > > Maybe you're a lurking operator who has opinions about this? Please > speak > > > up! :D > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Nick > > > > > > --0000000000008d92aa05a6cf94c6--