From dev-return-78063-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hbase.apache.org Tue Feb 25 22:44:42 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1756318025F for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:44:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 64986 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2020 22:44:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 64974 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2020 22:44:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0C1AE1A0E29 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.501 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera.com Received: from mx1-he-de.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHyUnaOqpNrS for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received-SPF: Pass (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12c; helo=mail-lf1-x12c.google.com; envelope-from=weichiu@cloudera.com; receiver= Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) by mx1-he-de.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-he-de.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4BAA67DD39 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id z9so460843lfa.2 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:44:38 -0800 (PST) X-ASF-DKIM-Sig: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=XdFSUnNlnIqPY6tMDU3oDdpBajJLer8Z53QyA0KFXA8=; b=D8s5ejjE/j3FXsXzwCUwfw8j11w6PF3NIOhmtPIhBI+Es8Q+Dc8VKd67DdT5XMRaNn 4pBgLzL0auLKrtZqmJDYWVEG157Byok3IEL81wpwd6R/hCAjnFoUCuFShoWz6QYVRtYZ u2XazM6lqtBFKi7LDrrIMjrG2L4QeNK+DZRoDZ5/yq0TGLMLjWH7l7xUFYXOeU+LiWSA gBS4o8SEh5qbRtymTqtsmocbTADKYpvLCLjesYgk52zs/EKtmQP5QX2dKQV+NaymmDKV loCyQCkBpO1KDQ7oWHYy3UP82JS+/frelyJzWace6tRcZNsJRmws8oKh1fUJG89Yfs9F qDqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=XdFSUnNlnIqPY6tMDU3oDdpBajJLer8Z53QyA0KFXA8=; b=uV3wP5xYAXltN/rV1UTR+gr+03BF978eh7N3AXOUPOJR/r3Oqboy9pIUquugblzNmm XlHb4Xwq4Ee1QMhrgm+iVjzImb5zlIvQ/Rua2xWA3zKYNGvg+nr6exdOM7yirVMyWsEe dtRN3EzsEIL79mLgRNTHc8pof/7qt/UckOOxWDqYwx8Ivagmila8bfmVrTyjtt8wSKu6 8IB5OB/Jd6FeZfAhtxUM08Piovl8MuVO+Ll6vA4JQKgIv3adoz5jZ4OWxdKUgxtCQaoq c8pRyCKL5B9tv56iq6a/ytv79ChyHDEX8Msk2qjT7FDAhFNGPEfTuDY4tmP8NMawYAYy C+hg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXi8tJCTVb3xIe3Rf12bV+QTuAL40r5k0C09xivgLljSfdsrr4N WhYPTNxNPEAFzO0DN4mJ1YK+HPOcXxs7+yk7xM3o0FgfN6A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxix0j6ue9G8Oelsor1KtJ311JCiiWMigdem5FqVH3j3eJtUC/FkyAXY/BIfBGEBm6N80+GWDoUaJi286kDvmM= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5549:: with SMTP id l9mr585887lfk.53.1582670677162; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:44:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Wei-Chiu Chuang Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:44:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [DISCUSS] EOL Hadoop branch-2.8 To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000825d27059f6e3bec" --000000000000825d27059f6e3bec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" FYI Also filed HBASE-23893 to keep track of the relevant work in HBase. I'd like to gather the feedback from the HBase community. Once branch-2.8 is EOL, what's the plan of Hadoop 2.x support? IMHO Hadoop 2.9 EOL would be the next. The last 2.9 release was 15 months ago and doesn't look like any one's picking it up. I don't think HBase is certified to run on Hadoop 2.10 yet. But in my opinion, I'd like to see Hadoop reducing Hadoop 2.x footprint sooner than later. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Wei-Chiu Chuang Date: Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 9:44 AM Subject: [DISCUSS] EOL Hadoop branch-2.8 To: Hadoop Common , Hdfs-dev < hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org>, yarn-dev , mapreduce-dev The last Hadoop 2.8.x release, 2.8.5, was GA on September 15th 2018. It's been 17 months since the release and the community by and large have moved up to 2.9/2.10/3.x. With Hadoop 3.3.0 over the horizon, is it time to start the EOL discussion and reduce the number of active branches? --000000000000825d27059f6e3bec--