hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: Branch-2.0: EOL and a 2.0.5RC
Date Sat, 16 Feb 2019 06:37:36 GMT
Remove the Master WALs at least. The beta is damaged.

If testing, trying to help out, I'd suggest move to branch-2.2. It is the
next minor release. 2.1.x has had some love and is in a good state. It is
superior to 2.0.x which we are trying to EOL (too many branches) so your
time would be better spent elsewhere.

Thanks for the help JMS,
S


On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:03 AM Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
wrote:

> Hi Stack,
>
> Thanks for looking at it. So what's next? Do you want to me try to put the
> latest 2.1 RC on top of it and see if it behaves well? Or just remove the
> Master WALs and stay on 2.0.4 to try the 2.2 upgrade path? I don' thave an
> urgent need of this cluster, so I can play a bit with it if it helps.
>
> Any JIRA that I should open or update based on that?
>
> JMS
>
> Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 21:16, Stack <stack@duboce.net> a écrit :
>
> > Took a quick look.
> >
> > On startup, it has hundreds of AMv2 WALs to recover. Its backed up unable
> > to let go of the early files because some old procedures have not
> > 'completed'.. This sort of backup problem has been addressed in later
> > hbase-2.0s.
> >
> > (Looks like oldest WAL is hdfs://
> >
> node2.distparser.com:8020/hbase/MasterProcWALs/pv2-00000000000000000016.log
> > )
> >
> > It then finds corrupt procedures which is probably why we are retaining
> > logs in first place. Corruption was fixed in later hbase-2.0s (may be a
> new
> > instance of corruption raising its head on master branch... but that
> > doesn't apply here).
> >
> > There is then an issue assigning namespace -- it has a mangled hostname
> --
> > which is probably why the fail... Would be interesting if we saw similar
> in
> > a later hbase... but probably a result of the mess above.
> >
> > Thanks for letting me take a look JMS.
> >
> > S
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 4:24 PM Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Doesn't seems to work very well.
> > >
> > > Can you try this one?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PMqJz4LjkEx0U2jYVVSLXaSEqcdHq7w4/view?usp=sharing
> > >
> > > JMS
> > >
> > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 16:27, Stack <stack@duboce.net> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:47 AM Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Probably not the best way to host a file, but logs are there:
> > > > > https://pastebin.com/dl/JaETSZfh
> > > > > I had a running 2.0.0-beta but 2.0.4 can't start.
> > > > > Let me know if you can't see the file (.tar.bz2) and I will try
> > > something
> > > > > different.
> > > > > JMS
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > Says "Your request is blocked due to invalid referrer. If you are
> > trying
> > > to
> > > > hotlink this page, please use: https://pastebin.com/raw/JaETSZfh".
> > > >
> > > > I'm doing something wrong?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks JMS,
> > > > S
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Le ven. 8 févr. 2019 à 14:15, Stack <stack@duboce.net> a
écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:42 PM Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > > > > > jean-marc@spaggiari.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Quick question here. Just upgraded from 2.0.0 BETA 2 to
2.0.4
> and
> > > I'm
> > > > > > > having some issues to start HBase. I will probably be able
to
> fix
> > > > that,
> > > > > > but
> > > > > > > I'm wondering if you want me to document those issues or
if
> 2.0.x
> > > is
> > > > > too
> > > > > > > old so it's not needed?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Hey JMS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would be interested in the issues you are seeing. Perhaps they
> > > pertain
> > > > to
> > > > > > branch-2.1+?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > S
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Le lun. 4 févr. 2019 à 21:11, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > palomino219@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > a
> > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> 于2019年2月5日周二
上午3:24写道:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:29 AM Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I was going to put up a 2.0.5 RC to address
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21791.Its
> been
> > > > > about a
> > > > > > > > month
> > > > > > > > > > since 2.0.4. There are 50 odd fixes in 2.0.5
currently
> [1]
> > > > mostly
> > > > > > > > > > perfunctory backports.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Stepping back though, I'd like to entertain
our letting
> the
> > > > > > > > branch-2.0.x
> > > > > > > > > > releases go. After 2.0.5, let's not backport
going
> forward
> > > and
> > > > > > > > encourage
> > > > > > > > > > users to move to branch-2.1. I can make
a release should
> a
> > > > > > > > super-critical
> > > > > > > > > > arise but otherwise, will let the branch
go to seed. We
> > have
> > > > > enough
> > > > > > > > > > branches as it is (smile).
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > S
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > 1.
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12344604
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk,
meaning torn
> > from
> > > > > > truth's
> > > > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > > > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message