hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] including shaded artifacts in the convenience binary
Date Thu, 31 May 2018 20:03:05 GMT

On 5/31/18 3:57 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 5/24/18 11:16 AM, Sean Busbey wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Mike Drob<mdrob@apache.org>  wrote:
>>>> Are the two issues (HBASE-20615 and HBASE-19735) conflicting, redundant,
>>>> or
>>>> orthogonal?
>>> I think they're orthogonal, at least as they stand. I think the fact
>>> that HBASE-19735 doesn't e.g. remove the shell from the main tarball
>>> is a good way to illustrate that inclusion in one doesn't obviate the
>>> possibility of inclusion in the other.
>>> That said, if HBASE-19735 lands then we could adapt the testing I'm
>>> getting in place as a part of HBASE-20331 to check that the generated
>>> artifact works as expected. If both landed then I'd probably want to
>>> test both using the same test.
>> If it makes sense to consolidate, I'd be happy to try to support that too.
>> We don't have any outstanding shaded jar issues, do we? I haven't made the
>> time to circle back around and do more testing.
> there are some under the umbrella HBASE-20331

4/5 in patch available? Let me add these to my queue to review :)

View raw message