From dev-return-67575-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@hbase.apache.org Sat Jan 13 19:01:27 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC035180630 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 19:01:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DC6AD160C2F; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 08680160C1F for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 19:01:25 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 40275 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2018 18:01:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 40257 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2018 18:01:24 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1406F18087D for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_SHORT=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qQq5-fJVQAu for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AB6A55FB94 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k19so6300412pfj.5 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:01:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=hydgYiT8+NVStTgYA9IsfUHvOfS6JJCT/Gj1ISlhUWc=; b=rtq+xLOCKEdIkdtuLDdH1e3g2N8qgxxRBBfzZwcGuRt2/VALxV/Y/0UdaXP/hX5i7L n+iySgOEuhvZeyhPuIdjNaIZx8flzMvLjtyJ9t8Ra4fGRuqGtL1flQP5O/Bkx699k3Wm yO9ljgHeoApiIjJG9mpYTwUl9O3fR2WgWDOP/qZuAWpoUymKdEdPdbQqf2KqcWyMW6pU OQLfN53QSLJRut4psRcQmrIjhkdelnrhUI6u1b9g8n8pcPQ91z9f2jKbi5VaxXIQEfUd jr2f9DvtHCe8u/HC8sHHxnhGSCKnUh1ag+7tee1oAyqs9tXCjAGvy0sxqQLMZTtZFImK zFWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=hydgYiT8+NVStTgYA9IsfUHvOfS6JJCT/Gj1ISlhUWc=; b=iG6uCdTbcgPYh4+Wi6yrM13NHpEZ/bCgN/dh9Tze2i0xuR65pDXQ067qSt6brEg8V2 Sxc3TUjhAtBjjBHBCW07Q3yR03k3Yn1b9K/E2BXNPy/j3zrICvjymUERRJ9/Kx6V6EKm Y5n14WswjdTKOy5A7Pb5v1vRXk0xiJ/7YNoGX9OPu+52JkHvZcxpBCpC0NQ6DzwfV3h3 tZToeg1dumnFt9lhyllmCROaPdj3kwFifciu9jIJoEJyVWbdFpKP5it1PT3GericaDin xdsRHhZ4LJM3qCB7nzwDgNVUA6um65Tymj3EqMSueY93h25onYyPmCnhNSmJPEs4G1uH hjdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyte0gQ0KmlYx1ziZ/1XeNBxXsWAxQupGZ0/IfNNJBfTpF+lrky9V HfRUNHpQiL7BV004fsrTsAkoeS2i X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotByuCPfXGF8TNa50sZbcEmWelElA+Q3FlrYvO+M0Dp4J0STohMZhv1/iiuWKgjLc4JQVW8VQ== X-Received: by 10.101.85.15 with SMTP id f15mr12414272pgr.153.1515866473775; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.9] (cpe-172-88-19-214.socal.res.rr.com. [172.88.19.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d81sm56834398pfj.163.2018.01.13.10.01.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:01:13 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Purtell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2018 10:01:11 -0800 Subject: Re: [VOTE] The fourth hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available for download Message-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: dev@hbase.apache.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C202) Clean first before running RAT checks. Better? > On Jan 13, 2018, at 8:41 AM, Ashish Singhi wrote= : >=20 > I ran RAT check on head of the branch-2 code. > I did first mvn clean install -DskipTests and then ran mvn apache-rat:chec= k >=20 > Anything I am missing or I need to do ? >=20 > Regards, > Ashish >=20 >> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Ted Yu wrote: >>=20 >> hbase-spark and hbase-prefix-tree modules should no longer be part of the= >> hbase 2.0 build process. >>=20 >> Can you check the files to see if they were left over from previous build= ? >>=20 >> Cheers >>=20 >> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 8:29 AM, Ashish Singhi >> wrote: >>=20 >>> RAT check fails for me, below error I see in the log file, >>>=20 >>> 4 Unknown Licenses >>>=20 >>> ***************************************************** >>>=20 >>> Files with unapproved licenses: >>>=20 >>> hbase-spark/target/test-classes.-284428056.timestamp >>> hbase-spark/target/classes.786562742.timestamp >>> hbase-spark/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties >>> hbase-prefix-tree/target/maven-archiver/pom.properties >>>=20 >>> ***************************************************** >>>=20 >>> CHANGES.txt file doesn't look correct. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Downloaded the binary and checked the following, >>>=20 >>> - Checked LICENSE and NOTICE files, looks ok >>>=20 >>> Verified the following in a non-kerberos setup, >>> - On a one node setup did upgrade from 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version to >>> 2.0.0-beta-1 >>> - Performed get and scan operation on data which were loaded in >>> 1.3.2-SNAPSHOT version >>> - Exercised basic shell commands >>> - Ran LTT with 1M row, checked read and write operations >>> - Poked around webUI >>> - Started Rest server and executed few commands >>> - Checked logs >>> - Browsed book >>>=20 >>> Regards, >>> Ashish >>>=20 >>>> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Stack wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> The fourth release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1 is up at: >>>>=20 >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-beta-1-RC3/ >>>>=20 >>>> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here: >>>>=20 >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >> orgapachehbase-1193 >>>>=20 >>>> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]. >>>>=20 >>>> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC1.7 at hash 026f535a7747b89003252ded9= >>>> 585e827686aa79f >>>>=20 >>>> This RC has some nice bug fixes over RC0-2 including fixing MOST of the= >>>> failing and flakey tests (We are still working through them). >>>>=20 >>>> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release. It includes all that was >> in >>>> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap read/write path, >>> in-memory >>>> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set are sealed. >>>>=20 >>>> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production preview of hbase-2.0.0. It >> is >>>> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive and flag us if we messed= >>> up >>>> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are particular interested in >>>> hearing from Coprocessor developers. >>>>=20 >>>> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [3]. >>> There >>>> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found= >>>> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy -- forgive me if mistakes). >>>>=20 >>>> I've updated our overview doc. on the state of 2.0.0 [6]. We'll do one >>> more >>>> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release Candidate by the end of >>>> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making it so users can do a >>>> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x (and any bug fixes found= >>>> running beta-1). Here is the list of what we have targeted so far for >>>> beta-2 [5]. Check it out. >>>>=20 >>>> One known issue is that the User API has not been properly filtered so >> it >>>> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public content (HBASE-19663, to >> be >>>> fixed by beta-2). >>>>=20 >>>> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote on whether it ok to put >> out >>>> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has not yet been updated). Let >>> the >>>> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Lets say Tuesday morning!) >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager >>>>=20 >>>> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2 >>>> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr >>>> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b >>>> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12340862 >>>> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4 >>>> z9iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/ >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20