hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jean-Marc Spaggiari <jean-m...@spaggiari.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The first hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 Release Candidate is available
Date Sat, 06 Jan 2018 20:52:37 GMT
Deleted the class to get all the tests running. Was running on the RC1 from
the tar.

I know get those one failing.

[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]   TestFavoredStochasticLoadBalancer.test2FavoredNodesDead:352
Balancer did not run
[ERROR]   TestRegionMergeTransactionOnCluster.testCleanMergeReference:284
hdfs://localhost:45311/user/jmspaggi/test-data/7c269e83-5982-449e-8cf8-6babaaaa4c7c/data/default/testCleanMergeReference/f1bdc6441b090dbacb391c74eaf0d1d0
[ERROR] Errors:
[ERROR]   TestDLSAsyncFSWAL>AbstractTestDLS.testThreeRSAbort:401 »
TableNotFound Region ...
[INFO]
[ERROR] Tests run: 3604, Failures: 2, Errors: 1, Skipped: 44


I have not been able to get all the tests passed locally for a while :(

JM

2018-01-06 15:05 GMT-05:00 Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>:

> Looks like you didn't include HBASE-19666 which would be in the next RC.
>
> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> jean-marc@spaggiari.org> wrote:
>
> > Trying with a different command line (mvn test -P runAllTests
> > -Dsurefire.secondPartThreadCount=12 -Dtest.build.data.basedirector
> y=/ram4g
> > ) I get all those one failing.  How are you able to get everything
> passed???
> >
> > [INFO] Results:
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Failures:
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74->TestCom
> > pactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]>
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145->T
> > estCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy.
> compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]>
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4
> >
> > Second run:
> > [INFO] Results:
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Failures:
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74->
> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy
> .compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]>
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145->
> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy
> .compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]>
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4
> >
> > Then again:
> >
> > [INFO] Results:
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Failures:
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio:74->
> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy
> .compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]>
> > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction:145->
> > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEquals:182->TestCompactionPolicy
> .compactEquals:201
> > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30, ]30, 30, 30]>
> > [INFO]
> > [ERROR] Tests run: 1235, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 4
> > [INFO]
> > [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------------
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >
> >
> > Sound like it's always the exact same result. Do I have a way to exclude
> > this TestCompactionPolicy test from the run?
> >
> > Here are more details from the last failure:
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------
> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelec
> tion
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > -------------------
> > Tests run: 4, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.323 s
> > <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> > testStuckStoreCompaction(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserve
> r.TestDefaultCompactSelection)
> > Time elapsed: 1.047 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99, 30,
> > ]30, 30, 30]>
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testStuckStoreCompaction(
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:145)
> >
> > testCompactionRatio(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.Tes
> tDefaultCompactSelection)
> > Time elapsed: 0.096 s  <<< FAILURE!
> > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]>
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio(
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection.java:74)
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,240 WARN  [StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b93
> 73a3c541ebab2a2-1]
> > util.CommonFSUtils(536): FileSystem doesn't support setStoragePolicy;
> > HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available. This is normal and expected on
> earlier
> > Hadoop versions.
> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalFileSystem.
> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String)
> >         at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.
> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.setStoragePolicy(
> > CommonFSUtils.java:518)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionFileSystem.
> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>(
> > HStore.java:250)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.
> > instantiateHStore(HRegion.java:5497)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call(
> > HRegion.java:1002)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion$1.call(
> > HRegion.java:999)
> >         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >         at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.
> > call(Executors.java:511)
> >         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> >         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,322 DEBUG [main] util.CommonFSUtils(538): FileSystem
> > doesn't support setStoragePolicy; HDFS-6584, HDFS-9345 not available.
> This
> > is normal and expected on earlier Hadoop versions.
> > java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocalFileSystem.
> > setStoragePolicy(org.apache.hadoop.fs.Path, java.lang.String)
> >         at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2130)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.
> > invokeSetStoragePolicy(CommonFSUtils.java:528)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CommonFSUtils.setStoragePolicy(
> > CommonFSUtils.java:518)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionFileSystem.
> > setStoragePolicy(HRegionFileSystem.java:193)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore.<init>(
> > HStore.java:250)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestCompactionPolicy.
> > initialize(TestCompactionPolicy.java:109)
> >         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.
> > TestCompactionPolicy.setUp(TestCompactionPolicy.java:69)
> >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
> >         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
> >         at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
> > FrameworkMethod.java:50)
> >         at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> > ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> >         at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
> > FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> >         at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> > evaluate(RunBefores.java:24)
> >         at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> > RunAfters.java:27)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:325)
> >         at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:78)
> >         at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:57)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:
> 71)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> > ParentRunner.java:288)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:
> 58)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> > ParentRunner.java:268)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
> >         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:27)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:290)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:
> 71)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(
> > ParentRunner.java:288)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:
> 58)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(
> > ParentRunner.java:268)
> >         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:363)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCore.run(
> > JUnitCore.java:55)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.
> > createRequestAndRun(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:137)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.
> > executeEager(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:107)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.
> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:83)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreWrapper.
> > execute(JUnitCoreWrapper.java:75)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.junitcore.JUnitCoreProvider.
> > invoke(JUnitCoreProvider.java:159)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> > invokeProviderInSameClassLoader(ForkedBooter.java:373)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.
> > runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:334)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.execute(
> > ForkedBooter.java:119)
> >         at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> > ForkedBooter.java:407)
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-06 12:53:53,398 INFO  [main] hbase.ResourceChecker(172): after:
> > regionserver.TestDefaultCompactSelection#testStuckStoreCompaction
> > Thread=11 (was 7)
> > Potentially hanging thread: Monitor thread for TaskMonitor
> >         java.lang.Thread.sleep(Native Method)
> >         org.apache.hadoop.hbase.monitoring.TaskMonitor$
> > MonitorRunnable.run(TaskMonitor.java:302)
> >         java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> > Potentially hanging thread: org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$
> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner
> >         java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> >         java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:143)
> >         java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:164)
> >         org.apache.hadoop.fs.FileSystem$Statistics$
> > StatisticsDataReferenceCleaner.run(FileSystem.java:3063)
> >         java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> > Potentially hanging thread: LruBlockCacheStatsExecutor
> >         sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> >         java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(
> > LockSupport.java:215)
> >         java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$
> > ConditionObject.awaitNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2078)
> >         java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:1093)
> >         java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$
> > DelayedWorkQueue.take(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:809)
> >         java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(
> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1074)
> >         java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(
> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1134)
> >         java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(
> > ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> >         java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >
> > Potentially hanging thread: StoreOpener-22ce1d683ba4b6b9373a3c541ebab2
> > a2-1.LruBlockCache.EvictionThread
> >         java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
> >         org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.LruBlockCache$EvictionThre
> ad.run(
> > LruBlockCache.java:894)
> >         java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> >  - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=232 (was 232),
> > MaxFileDescriptor=1048576 (was 1048576), SystemLoadAverage=204 (was 204),
> > ProcessCount=273 (was 273), AvailableMemoryMB=4049 (was 4132)
> >
> >
> > Full log attached
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > JMS
> >
> >
> > 2018-01-06 9:34 GMT-05:00 Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org>:
> >
> >> I can reproduce the issue locally. I think it has to do with the java
> >> version being used - IIRC this is related to the version of java used,
> but
> >> we can discuss in more detail on the JIRA.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19721
> >>
> >> Thanks, JMS!
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 6:42 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> >> jean-marc@spaggiari.org
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > How you guys are able to get the tests running?
> >> >
> >> > For me it keeps failing on TestReversedScannerCallable.
> >> >
> >> > I tried many times, always fails in the same place. I'm running on a
> 4GB
> >> > tmpfs. Details are below. Am I doing something wrong?
> >> >
> >> > JM
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ./dev-support/hbasetests.sh runAllTests
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestOperation
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > [INFO] Results:
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > [ERROR] Errors:
> >> > [ERROR]   TestReversedScannerCallable.unnecessary Mockito stubbings »
> >> > UnnecessaryStubbing
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > [ERROR] Tests run: 245, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 8
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >> > [INFO]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase ....................................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 1.409 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Checkstyle .......................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 1.295 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Support ....................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 0.038 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Error Prone Rules ................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 1.069 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Annotations ......................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 1.450 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Build Configuration ................. SUCCESS [
> >> > 0.073 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Shaded Protocol ..................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 14.292 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Common .............................. SUCCESS
> >> [01:51
> >> > min]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics API ......................... SUCCESS [
> >> > 2.878 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ................ SUCCESS [
> >> > 12.216 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Metrics Implementation .............. SUCCESS [
> >> > 7.206 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Hadoop Two Compatibility ............ SUCCESS [
> >> > 12.440 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Protocol ............................ SUCCESS [
> >> > 0.074 s]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Client .............................. FAILURE
> >> [02:10
> >> > min]
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Zookeeper ........................... SKIPPED
> >> > [INFO] Apache HBase - Replication ......................... SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > -------------------
> >> > Test set: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable
> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > -------------------
> >> > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.515
> s
> >> <<<
> >> > FAILURE! - in org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client
> >> .TestReversedScannerCallable
> >> > unnecessary Mockito
> >> > stubbings(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable)
> >> > Time
> >> > elapsed: 0.014 s  <<< ERROR!
> >> > org.mockito.exceptions.misusing.UnnecessaryStubbingException:
> >> >
> >> > Unnecessary stubbings detected in test class:
> >> TestReversedScannerCallable
> >> > Clean & maintainable test code requires zero unnecessary code.
> >> > Following stubbings are unnecessary (click to navigate to relevant
> line
> >> of
> >> > code):
> >> >   1. -> at
> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp(
> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:66)
> >> >   2. -> at
> >> > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestReversedScannerCallable.setUp(
> >> > TestReversedScannerCallable.java:68)
> >> > Please remove unnecessary stubbings. More info: javadoc for
> >> > UnnecessaryStubbingException class.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2018-01-06 0:44 GMT-05:00 stack <saint.ack@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > On Jan 5, 2018 4:44 PM, "Apekshit Sharma" <appy@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > bq. Care needs to be exercised backporting. Bug fixes only please.
> If
> >> in
> >> > > doubt, ping me, the RM, please. Thanks.
> >> > > In that case, shouldn't we branch out branch-2.0? We can then do
> >> normal
> >> > > backports to branch-2 and only bug fixes to branch-2.0.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Don't you think we have enough branches already mighty Appy?
> >> > >
> >> > > No new features on branch-2? New features are in master/3.0.0 only?
> >> > >
> >> > > S
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org
> >
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool is a flake, not a consistent fail.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> >> apurtell@apache.org>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > This one is probably my fault:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > HBASE-19406
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > Balazs fixed it above, HBASE-19666
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > It can easily be reverted. The failure of interest
> >> > > > > > is TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.tes
> tLABChunkQueueWithMultipleMSLA
> >> Bs.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > This seems fine. Passes in nightly
> >> > > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/job/HBase%
> >> > > > > 20Nightly/job/branch-2/171/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.
> >> > > > > hbase.regionserver/TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool/
> >> > > > > and locally against the tag. It fails consistently for you
> Andrew?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Should all unit tests pass on a beta? I think
so, at least
> if
> >> the
> >> > > > > > failures
> >> > > > > > > are 100% repeatable.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > This is fair. Let me squash this RC and roll another.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Will put it up in a few hours.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > S
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -0
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> >> > > > > > > RAT check: ok
> >> > > > > > > Built from source: ok (8u144)
> >> > > > > > > Ran unit tests: some failures (8u144)
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.t
> >> estCompactionRatio:74->
> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq
> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy.
> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201
> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[4, 2, 1]]> but was:<[[]]>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [ERROR]   TestDefaultCompactSelection.
> >> > > testStuckStoreCompaction:145->
> >> > > > > > > TestCompactionPolicy.compactEq
> uals:182->TestCompactionPolicy.
> >> > > > > > compactEquals:201
> >> > > > > > > expected:<[[]30, 30, 30]> but was:<[[99,
30, ]30, 30, 30]>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > [ERROR]   TestMemstoreLABWithoutPool.
> >> > > testLABChunkQueueWithMultipleM
> >> > > > > > SLABs:143
> >> > > > > > > All the chunks must have been cleared
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-beta-1
is up
> at:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> >> > > > beta-1-RC0/
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging
directory
> here:
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> > > > > orgapachehbase-1188
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> All was signed with my key at 8ACC93D2 [1]
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-beta-1-RC0
> >> > > > > > >> (0907563eb72697b394b8b960fe54887d6ff304fd)
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is our first beta release.
It includes
> all
> >> > that
> >> > > > was
> >> > > > > > in
> >> > > > > > >> previous alphas (new assignment manager, offheap
read/write
> >> > path,
> >> > > > > > >> in-memory
> >> > > > > > >> compactions, etc.). The APIs and feature-set
are sealed.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> hbase-2.0.0-beta-1 is a not-for-production
preview of
> >> > hbase-2.0.0.
> >> > > > It
> >> > > > > is
> >> > > > > > >> meant for devs and downstreamers to test drive
and flag us
> >> if we
> >> > > > > messed
> >> > > > > > up
> >> > > > > > >> on anything ahead of our rolling GAs. We are
particular
> >> > interested
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > > > >> hearing from Coprocessor developers.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so
far can be found
> >> here
> >> > > > [3].
> >> > > > > > >> There
> >> > > > > > >> are thousands. The list of ~2k+ fixes in 2.0.0
exclusively
> >> can
> >> > be
> >> > > > > found
> >> > > > > > >> here [4] (My JIRA JQL foo is a bit dodgy --
forgive me if
> >> > > mistakes).
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> I've updated our overview doc. on the state
of 2.0.0 [6].
> >> We'll
> >> > do
> >> > > > one
> >> > > > > > >> more
> >> > > > > > >> beta before we put up our first 2.0.0 Release
Candidate by
> >> the
> >> > end
> >> > > > of
> >> > > > > > >> January, 2.0.0-beta-2. Its focus will be making
it so users
> >> can
> >> > do
> >> > > a
> >> > > > > > >> rolling upgrade on to hbase-2.x from hbase-1.x
(and any bug
> >> > fixes
> >> > > > > found
> >> > > > > > >> running beta-1). Here is the list of what
we have targeted
> so
> >> > far
> >> > > > for
> >> > > > > > >> beta-2 [5]. Check it out.
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> One knownissue is that the User API has not
been properly
> >> > filtered
> >> > > > so
> >> > > > > it
> >> > > > > > >> shows more than just InterfaceAudience Public
content
> >> > > (HBASE-19663,
> >> > > > to
> >> > > > > > be
> >> > > > > > >> fixed by beta-2).
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Please take this beta for a spin. Please vote
on whether it
> >> ok
> >> > to
> >> > > > put
> >> > > > > > out
> >> > > > > > >> this RC as our first beta (Note CHANGES has
not yet been
> >> > updated).
> >> > > > Let
> >> > > > > > the
> >> > > > > > >> VOTE be open for 72 hours (Monday)
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > > > > >> Your 2.0.0 Release Manager
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >> 1. http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=
> >> > 0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2
> >> > > > > > >> 3. https://goo.gl/scYjJr
> >> > > > > > >> 4. https://goo.gl/dFFT8b
> >> > > > > > >> 5. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/
> >> > > 12340862
> >> > > > > > >> 6. https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> >> > > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_
> >> > > > > > >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/
> >> > > > > > >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/
> >> > 1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_
> >> > > > > > ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/>
> >> > > > > > >>
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > > > > Andrew
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning
torn
> from
> >> > > > truth's
> >> > > > > > > decrepit hands
> >> > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > > > Andrew
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning
torn from
> >> > > truth's
> >> > > > > > decrepit hands
> >> > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > Andrew
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> >> truth's
> >> > > > decrepit hands
> >> > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > -- Appy
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message