Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFAMeY+L85PmcAOGCMEgL_rJ75d3U6qZmxJmvKQ4kF6bxg9ReA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANZa=GuQTUV_mMCu6bxLdBjdXTZOb_66U=QaqvUJSfQoyGpx_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFAMeY+Lf553xR2PyXgW_6ko8tUeMreZtfDs8uM8VyU8jzBLRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <47DF88CC-22F2-4FE4-8003-559EAEF991A6@gmail.com> <CAFAMeYKJNQgBeB3gQFiRD0CBNC0p3qzs-TwqjOPvncHYa1oC+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_BiLe=G=FRFBkYiaPWXr8vUdcBPuDrk+y0aGOF9yFYMxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_AL-4ytuR_10hSu6vBNObWN6nrV+vm5v_siCOTqDSOu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFAMeYJbvEMm+EiD+_9tXtzS+JHw+r+6MhNHEPh_B849B7aD8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_Djf7yED4dYXmBMgbk_tT_HLcAZXyeRNW5_7dGFcd064w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADcMMgGQKoBqwK6LP2qWf8RrK07u65WoeswE4Q1x8TaDVfkkNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=GvybsH4BtriqUALP3ySP_D50MmOb_zXJw8wR-qd4PvKsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62zNSXnAWJLm0xG0vX_GffbZi14ePrtbwFCcZjh=GnOvog@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=GtJxySUaT5coXZuLf_CSKyZxwvs7JBOog3g9bSmrsFCvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+RK=_CtG=bysZrLSDQafAzPefTsUDcMLLHoc7SX1Q_rXAfeMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62xjUYkzoQrOpT0HDrfTjOL_-33N8rTW7RxRdshXJM0EiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=GvX_-i8_3ongXkHkTJmv7gaFzBEm6dMqf_VrxQ7Ng+c7w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANZa=GuiMpOWzDrvfpCt_m+j8hVgZ34J25KV2LyEeGq-1YjLQg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFAMeY+L85PmcAOGCMEgL_rJ75d3U6qZmxJmvKQ4kF6bxg9ReA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:14:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CANZa=GsWUrB-cLEoaoa1pxYQCAXgXxa52aNtfrb8ASzDE=wvxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.1.13 (RC0) is available
To: hbase-dev <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082d0508bb14220560155747"
archived-at: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:14:33 -0000

--089e082d0508bb14220560155747
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org> wrote:

> Yea, this candidate is fine to promote from my perspective and given the
> other votes cast. Thanks for putting this together, Nick!
>

Mike,

In that case, would you mind formally upgrading your vote from a -1? I'd
like to remove any ambiguity that may remain. With that done, I can call
the VOTE.

Thanks,
Nick

On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > At close of the period, this VOTE has received 3x binding +1's, a
> > non-binding +1, and a non-binding -1, with no other votes cast.
> >
> > My understanding is that the issues raised by the non-binding -1 are to
> be
> > taken as guidance for subsequent release lines and do not impact the
> > standing of this candidate.
> >
> > Mike, is that view consistent with your intentions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:00 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - verified tarballs vs public key on people.apache.org.
> > > - extracted bin tgz:
> > >   - inspect structure. look good.
> > >   - with jdk1.8.0_65:
> > >     - run LoadTestTool against standalone bin tgz with FAST_DIFF block
> > > encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good.
> > >     - poked around webUI. looks good.
> > >   - load the site, browsed book.
> > > - extracted src tgz:
> > >   - inspect structure. look good.
> > >   - run LoadTestTool against standalone built from src tgz with
> FAST_DIFF
> > > block encoder and ROWCOL blooms. No issues, logs look good.
> > >   - poked around webUI. looks good.
> > > - ran the hbase-downstreamer project vs. the staged maven repository.
> > > tests pass.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > >> Ran unit tests: passed
> > >> Started standalone cluster and did some basic operations
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > +1
> > >> >
> > >> > Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > >> > Checked compat report: ok
> > >> > RAT check passed: ok (7u80)
> > >> > Built from source: ok (7u80)
> > >> > Unit tests pass: ok (8u131)
> > >> > 1M row LTT: ok (8u131)
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@apache.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > No one has voted a binding -1 with actionable changes, so as far
> as
> > >> I'm
> > >> > > concerned this RC remains valid. If people need more time, we can
> > >> extend
> > >> > > this vote.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > > Nick
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Nick:
> > >> > > > Originally you set tomorrow as deadline.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Is there a new RC coming out (w.r.t. Mike's comment) ?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Cheers
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Nick Dimiduk <
> ndimiduk@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Mike:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Do you plan to make a human-readable set of release notes in
> > >> > addition
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > > the list of JIRA issues resolved?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Not as such. For all branch-1.1 releases, I've written up a
> > little
> > >> > > > > human-friendly summary in the ANNOUNCE email. Basically,
> > >> expanding on
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > list of JIRA tickets I highlight in the RC notes to include
> > their
> > >> > full
> > >> > > > > ticket summaries. I haven't followed the details of the
> > branch-1.4
> > >> > > > release
> > >> > > > > line, so I'm not sure what additional information you might be
> > >> hoping
> > >> > > > for.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > tar missing hbase-native-client (present in tag)
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > That's been the case since rel/1.1.0. We as a community have
> > >> never
> > >> > > > shipped
> > >> > > > > a binary native client in this release line and we've never
> > >> claimed
> > >> > > that
> > >> > > > > the native sources packaged herein are ready for production
> > >> > > consumption.
> > >> > > > > They probably should have been dropped from the branch before
> > >> initial
> > >> > > > > release, but that was not done. I have no objection to
> dropping
> > >> them
> > >> > > > from a
> > >> > > > > branch-1.1 release; from the git log, I see no commit activity
> > to
> > >> > that
> > >> > > > > module since Jan 2014. I don't see any of this as a blocker
> for
> > >> this
> > >> > > RC.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > WARNING! HBase file layout needs to be upgraded ...
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > When I test these RC's on a Mac, I explicitly set
> hbase.tmp.dir
> > >> to a
> > >> > > > > location specific to the candidate I've unpacked. This has the
> > >> > benefit
> > >> > > > > avoiding cross-version conflicts and other weirdness of Mac
> tmp
> > >> > > directory
> > >> > > > > management. For instance,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > <configuration>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > <property><name>hbase.tmp.dir</name><value>/tmp/hbase-1.1.
> > >> > > > > 13/tmp</value></property>
> > >> > > > > </configuration>
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Peter:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > In the logs I saw this line. Source code repository URL
> looks
> > >> > > > incorrect.
> > >> > > > > > 2017-12-04 10:13:27,028 INFO  [main] util.VersionInfo:
> Source
> > >> code
> > >> > > > > repository *git://diocles.local/Volumes/hbase-1.1.13/hbase*
> > >> > > > > revision=c64bf8a9f35352cd504f2b8f4b02f9148cf45ab6
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Looking through the log, HBASE-16538 /
> > >> > > > > 851c89af6ef9a78e2e3bc9ad3153367e85731c81 looks suspicious. It
> > >> looks
> > >> > > like
> > >> > > > > that change first shipped in 1.1.7. Indeed, I see the
> equivelant
> > >> line
> > >> > > in
> > >> > > > > the binary release of 1.1.12.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:52 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > >> > apurtell@apache.org
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to
> > generate
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > src
> > >> > > > > > tar
> > >> > > > > > > instead of the src assembly.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > We could update the make_rc.sh script to create the source
> > >> > tarball
> > >> > > in
> > >> > > > > > this
> > >> > > > > > > way. Would you be willing to make a patch for that?
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > (I think you fellows already figured this going by JIRA
> > >> > movement....)
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > HBASE-19152 "Update refguide 'how to build an RC' and the
> > >> > make_rc.sh
> > >> > > > > > script" changed make_rc.sh to use git archive. Wasn't
> > backported
> > >> > > > though.
> > >> > > > > > S
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > For release 1.4.0 and up though I propose we remove
> > >> > > > hbase-native-client
> > >> > > > > > as
> > >> > > > > > > unmaintained. It can be resurrected as an independent
> > project
> > >> on
> > >> > > > GitHub
> > >> > > > > > if
> > >> > > > > > > any interested parties show up.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Mike Drob <
> > mdrob@apache.org>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I think I used some shorthand earlier and ambiguously
> > >> > represented
> > >> > > > my
> > >> > > > > > > > problem. The issue is that native is missing from the
> > >> _source_
> > >> > > > > > tarball. I
> > >> > > > > > > > completely understand why it would be missing from the
> > >> binary
> > >> > > > > tarball,
> > >> > > > > > > > maintaining native binaries is a huge hassle and not in
> > our
> > >> > > scope,
> > >> > > > > IMO.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > However, I think it is fair for users to expect that
> they
> > >> can
> > >> > > > > download
> > >> > > > > > > our
> > >> > > > > > > > source release, and build a native client from there. Or
> > at
> > >> > least
> > >> > > > it
> > >> > > > > > will
> > >> > > > > > > > have native code. They shouldn't need to go to git to
> the
> > >> the
> > >> > > > native
> > >> > > > > > > source
> > >> > > > > > > > code.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > I think this can be fixed by using `git archive` to
> > generate
> > >> > the
> > >> > > > src
> > >> > > > > > tar
> > >> > > > > > > > instead of the src assembly.  The other option is to
> > remove
> > >> the
> > >> > > > > > > > hbase-native-client directory from branch-1.1 and then
> > >> there's
> > >> > no
> > >> > > > > > > > divergence between src tar and src tag.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Either is fine with me.
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:36 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > >> > > > apurtell@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > I propose to eject hbase-native-client to GitHub on
> > >> > HBASE-19419
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > >> > > > > apurtell@apache.org
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > hbase-native-client isn't hooked up to the build. We
> > >> don't
> > >> > > > have a
> > >> > > > > > > > > 'native'
> > >> > > > > > > > > > profile like Hadoop that recurses into native
> > component
> > >> > > > > directories
> > >> > > > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > > invokes cmake. This won't be available in any RC any
> > RM
> > >> > would
> > >> > > > > > > generate.
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Does one even make sense? Binaries built against
> what?
> > >> What
> > >> > > do
> > >> > > > > you
> > >> > > > > > > > > propose?
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Mike Drob <
> > >> > mdrob@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> Thanks for the pointer, Andrew. This worked for me
> > and
> > >> I
> > >> > was
> > >> > > > > able
> > >> > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > start
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> hbase now and can resume testing.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> I didn't mean to imply that Nick needs to create
> > human
> > >> > > release
> > >> > > > > > > notes,
> > >> > > > > > > > > but
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> wanted to know if he had considered it in light of
> > the
> > >> > plan
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > do
> > >> > > > > > so
> > >> > > > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> 1.4.0. I think it's a nice to have, but definitely
> > not
> > >> > > > critical.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> (I'm still -1 due to the tar/tag discrepancy,
> > however.)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> > >> > > > > > > > > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > I think you need to delete $TMPDIR/hbase-mdrob
> (or
> > >> > > whatever
> > >> > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > your
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > username) before testing the binaries. Looks like
> > >> you've
> > >> > > > been
> > >> > > > > > > > testing
> > >> > > > > > > > > a
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > later version and it's left data behind.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > We have not produced release notes beyond the
> JIRA
> > >> > > generated
> > >> > > > > > ones
> > >> > > > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > prior releases. We will soon. This is something I
> > >> agreed
> > >> > > to
> > >> > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > > > > 1.4.0. I
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > don't think it's fair to expect Nick to do it for
> > the
> > >> > last
> > >> > > > > 1.1.x
> > >> > > > > > > > > release
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > when it hasn't been done prior, but I'm not
> saying
> > >> don't
> > >> > > do
> > >> > > > it
> > >> > > > > > if
> > >> > > > > > > he
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> wants
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > to.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > On Dec 4, 2017, at 8:43 AM, Mike Drob <
> > >> > mdrob@apache.org
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > -1 (non-binding)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > general:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > + sign, sums good
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > src:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - tar missing hbase-native-client (present in
> > tag)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > + can build from source (oracle jdk 1.7.0_80)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > bin:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - docs/doap_Hbase.rdf is very out of date
> > (possibly
> > >> > not
> > >> > > > > > actually
> > >> > > > > > > > an
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > issue)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > - unable to launch using bin/hbase-start.sh
> (both
> > >> > java 7
> > >> > > > and
> > >> > > > > > 8),
> > >> > > > > > > > got
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > following error in .out log file:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > WARNING! HBase file layout needs to be
> upgraded.
> > >> You
> > >> > > have
> > >> > > > > > > version
> > >> > > > > > > > > null
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > and
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > I want version 8. Consult
> > >> > http://hbase.apache.org/book.
> > >> > > > html
> > >> > > > > > for
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> further
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > information about upgrading HBase. Is your
> > >> > hbase.rootdir
> > >> > > > > > valid?
> > >> > > > > > > If
> > >> > > > > > > > > so,
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > you
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > may need to run 'hbase hbck -fixVersionFile'.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > System Info:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > mdrob@mdrob-MBP:/tmp/hbase-1.1-0/hbase-1.1.13$
> > >> > sw_vers
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > ProductName: Mac OS X
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > ProductVersion: 10.12.6
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > BuildVersion: 16G1036
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > mdrob@mdrob-MBP:/tmp/hbase-1.1-0/hbase-1.1.13$
> > >> java
> > >> > > > > -version
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > java version "1.7.0_80"
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build
> > >> 1.7.0_80-b15)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build
> > 24.80-b11,
> > >> > > mixed
> > >> > > > > > mode)
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Mike
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Nick Dimiduk
> <
> > >> > > > > > > > ndimiduk@apache.org
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> I'm happy to announce the first release
> > candidate
> > >> of
> > >> > > > HBase
> > >> > > > > > > 1.1.13
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> (HBase-1.1.13RC0) is available for download at
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://dist.apache.org/
> > >> > repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.
> > >> > > > > > 1.13RC0/
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://dist.apache.org/
> > >> > repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.
> > >> > > > > > 1.13RC0/
> > >> > > > > > > > >*.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> This is to be the final release from
> branch-1.1.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Maven artifacts are available in the staging
> > >> > repository
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://repository.apache.org
> > >> /content/repositories/
> > >> > > > > orgapach
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> ehbase-1182
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://repository.apache.org
> > >> /content/repositories/
> > >> > > > > orgapach
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> ehbase-1182
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >*
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Artifacts are signed with my code signing
> subkey
> > >> > > > > > > > > 0xAD9039071C3489BD,
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> available in the Apache keys directory
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> https://people.apache.org/keys
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> /committer/ndimiduk.asc
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://people.apache.org/
> > >> > keys/committer/ndimiduk.asc
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > and
> > >> > > > > > in
> > >> > > > > > > > our
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> KEYS
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> file http://www-us.apache.org/dist/
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> hbase/KEYS <http://www-us.apache.org/dist
> > >> /hbase/KEYS
> > >> > >.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> There's also a signed tag for this release at
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://git-wip-us.apache.
> > >> > > org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=
> > >> > > > tag
> > >> > > > > ;
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> h=16a04e6629e614c7900c443f3a29cdba92dd7b7e
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://git-wip-us.apache.
> > >> > > org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git;a=
> > >> > > > tag
> > >> > > > > ;
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> h=16a04e6629e614c7900c443f3a29cdba92dd7b7e>*
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> The detailed source and binary compatibility
> > >> report
> > >> > vs
> > >> > > > > 1.1.12
> > >> > > > > > > has
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> been
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> published for your review, at
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://home.apache.org/~ndim
> > >> iduk/1.1.12_1.1.13RC0_
> > >> > > > > compat_
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> report.html
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://home.apache.org/~ndim
> > >> iduk/1.1.12_1.1.13RC0_
> > >> > > > > compat_
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> report.html
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >*
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> HBase 1.1.13 is the thirteenth and final patch
> > >> > release
> > >> > > in
> > >> > > > > the
> > >> > > > > > > > HBase
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> 1.1
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> line, continuing on the theme of bringing a
> > >> stable,
> > >> > > > > reliable
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> database to
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> the Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This release
> > >> > includes
> > >> > > > > over
> > >> > > > > > 40
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> resolved
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> issues since the 1.1.12 release; the majority
> of
> > >> > these
> > >> > > > > > changes
> > >> > > > > > > > are
> > >> > > > > > > > > to
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > build
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> tooling rather than the product itself.
> Notable
> > >> > product
> > >> > > > > > > > correctness
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > fixes
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> include HBASE-18665 and HBASE-19052.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> The full list of fixes included in this
> release
> > is
> > >> > > > > available
> > >> > > > > > at
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> *https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > >> > > > > proj
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> ectId=12310753&version=12341346
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> <https://issues.apache.org/
> > >> > > jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > >> > > > > proj
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> ectId=12310753&version=12341346>*
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> and
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the
> > >> > > distribution.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by
> > >> 23:59
> > >> > > > > Pacific
> > >> > > > > > > time
> > >> > > > > > > > > on
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Friday, 2017-12-08 as to whether we should
> > release
> > >> > > these
> > >> > > > > > > > artifacts
> > >> > > > > > > > > as
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > HBase
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> 1.1.13.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >> Nick
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >> >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning
> > >> torn
> > >> > > from
> > >> > > > > > > truth's
> > >> > > > > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > >> > > > > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > > > > > > Andrew
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning
> > torn
> > >> > from
> > >> > > > > > truth's
> > >> > > > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > >> > > > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > > > > Andrew
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn
> > from
> > >> > > > truth's
> > >> > > > > > > decrepit hands
> > >> > > > > > >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Best regards,
> > >> > Andrew
> > >> >
> > >> > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from
> truth's
> > >> > decrepit hands
> > >> >    - A23, Crosstalk
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

--089e082d0508bb14220560155747--