Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8A2200D72 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 01:47:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D8F2C160C2E; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 00:47:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 29F4F160C1C for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 01:47:15 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 58553 invoked by uid 500); 24 Dec 2017 00:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 58542 invoked by uid 99); 24 Dec 2017 00:47:13 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 00:47:13 +0000 Received: from mail-qk0-f176.google.com (mail-qk0-f176.google.com [209.85.220.176]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 1651B1A0052 for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2017 00:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 143so24010447qki.2 for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:47:11 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKtgAKG+z7NU67dFqEFrZXEYm6BVUX3568aXtIq3P/AhV2Kulco qa7OxmHJXdNwq92yLYqYjsPiHjepMRv8QDNpaCs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBov0TzZ7NNInWaSHOF78epYlxN6Nkc5YS+Aua2xvAOs+RMIH6VOusqTnOKJ5HsjYqDRShIZDuoA6iIfAn8GkC60= X-Received: by 10.55.20.198 with SMTP id 67mr17181740qku.55.1514076430655; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:47:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.149.97 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:47:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.12.149.97 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:47:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Sean Busbey Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:47:09 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Default configurations in hbase-2.0.0 hbase-default.xml To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11447f10cfe49005610b6350" archived-at: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 00:47:16 -0000 --001a11447f10cfe49005610b6350 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Is the source content clearly licensed in a compatible way? If not, please someone file a request with the original author for a suitable donation to the project. We can't copy docs any more than we can copy code. On Dec 22, 2017 12:51, "Misty Stanley-Jones" wrote: Please file a doc bug linking to the content. Maybe mark newbie. :) On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:07 AM Stack wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Mike Drob wrote: > > > I'm not super comfortable with that... > > > > If it has a spotty record like you suggest, then I don't want to be > ironing > > out issues with it so close to beta/release. There's already enough to > iron > > out and we're so close to the end that I don't want to risk destabilizing > > at this point... > > > > > > Fair point. Let me undo it. > > I just came across this nice doc on region normalizer [1] by our brother > Romil Choksi (Can we get this added to the refguide? I could copy/paste it > if folks don't mind). Reading it, it seems like it is easy doing an enable > and a one-off run so it is a low-barrier trying it. We need to talk this > tool up when folks are in situation where they have ill-filled regions and > want to merge adjacents. Meantime, try it a few times ... > > S > > 1. > > https://community.hortonworks.com/articles/54987/hbase- region-normalizer.html > > > > > Mike > > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Stack wrote: > > > > > There's been a request to enable region normalization by default. > Sounds > > > reasonable to me. Any objections? I think normalization has spotted > > record > > > so far. Enabling it we can try and iron out and issues with it before > we > > do > > > the hbase 2.0.0 RC. If not possible, can disable before RC. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > S > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Stack wrote: > > > > > > > (I thought I'd already posted a DISCUSSION on defaults for 2.0.0 but > > > can't > > > > find it...) > > > > > > > > Dear All: > > > > > > > > I'm trying to get some eyeballs/thoughts on changes you'd like seen > in > > > > hbase defaults for hbase-2.0.0. We have a an ISSUE and some good > > > discussion > > > > already up at HBASE-19148. > > > > > > > > A good case is being made for enabling balancing by table as default. > > > > > > > > Guanghao Zhang has already put in place more sensible retry/timeout > > > > numbers. > > > > > > > > Anything else we should change? Shout here or up on the issue. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > S > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --001a11447f10cfe49005610b6350--