hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodio...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Items to purge from branch-2 before we cut hbase-2.0.0-beta1.
Date Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:39:00 GMT
Sean

No, this is not our backup description, it is pre-backup era guideline how
to do backup in HBase, using snapshots, copy table etc.



On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

> Vlad,
>
> As someone who hasn't spent much time with the backup/restore feature
> yet, could you help me out on getting a foothold?
>
> Which of these Backup/Restore options is it we're specifically talking
> about:
>
> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#ops.backup
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Vladimir Rodionov
> <vladrodionov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> hbase-backup: Not done and it doesn't look like it will be done for
> > beta-1.
> >>>It can come in later in a 2.1 or 3.0 when it is finished.
> >
> > That is not correct. All blockers have been resolved, the last one has a
> > patch which is ready to be commited.
> >
> > Salesforce team has conducted independent testing and found no issues
> with
> > a functionality to my best knowledge.
> >
> > Explain please, Stack.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I want to purge the below list of modules, features, and abandoned code
> >> from branch-2 before we make a beta-1 (4-5 weeks I'm thinking). Lets
> >> discuss. Some are already scheduled for removal but listing anyways for
> >> completeness sake. Pushback or other suggestions on what else we should
> >> remove are welcome.
> >>
> >> Distributed Log Replay: Just last week, I heard of someone scheduling
> >> testing of DLR. We need to better message that this never worked and
> was/is
> >> not supported. It's a good idea that we should implement but built on a
> >> different chasis (procedurev2?). Meantime, DLR is still scattered about
> the
> >> codebase as an optional code path. Lets remove it.
> >>
> >> hbase-native-client: It is not done and won't be for 2.0.0. It can come
> in
> >> later when it is done (2.1 or 3.0).
> >>
> >> hbase-prefix-tree: A visionary effort that unfortunately has had no
> uptake
> >> since its original wizard-author moved on. I don't believe it is used
> >> anywhere. It has become a drag as global changes need to be applied in
> here
> >> too by folks who are not up on how it works probably doing damage along
> the
> >> way. This is like DLR in it should be first class but we've not done the
> >> work to keep it up.
> >>
> >> hbase-backup: Not done and it doesn't look like it will be done for
> beta-1.
> >> It can come in later in a 2.1 or 3.0 when it is finished.
> >>
> >> hbase-spark: Purging this makes me tear-up.
> >>
> >> What else?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message