hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <els...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-thirdparty versioning
Date Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:08:25 GMT


On 11/28/17 4:54 PM, Stack wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Mike Drob <mdrob@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Wanted to get some input on the versioning scheme for our hbase-thirdparty
>> artifacts.
>>
>> We are moving all of the relocation from o.a.h.shaded to o.a.h.thirdparty
>> due to conflicts with our non-thirdparty shaded libraries. Currently, the
>> next release is slated to be of the thirdparty libs is slated to be 1.0.2,
>> however the package change seems like a big deal.
>>
>> I propose that we go to 1.1.0 or 2.0.0 even with this. Version numbers are
>> cheap, we won't run out, so we can afford to be aggressive with
>> incrementing them. And we don't have to worry about other users of this,
>> since it's all designed to be internal.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
> 2.0.0

+1

Mime
View raw message