Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN5cbe67pn3X3YTdf7A26fA_5b79-usv+0Bh9OWwz-938e-HEQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+RK=_D=WbouWyR-bjWKdv4fNCYki77ReQ6RzFCU81qvS9hAuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN5cbe67pn3X3YTdf7A26fA_5b79-usv+0Bh9OWwz-938e-HEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 16:59:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RK=_Cq5+rjiba_P=f70juP=b3aiFxDLnJUsnK5pKeJFbznfw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Branch 1.4 update
To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0479d636d701055ac1689d"
archived-at: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:09 -0000

--94eb2c0479d636d701055ac1689d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Francis Liu has talked before about how useful this feature has been for
them.

Unfortunately I won't be able to give you personal feedback until some time
after it is out in the 1.4 code line. The way the schedule looks a 1.4.0
release will precede (and be a prerequisite for) enabling rsgroups in our
production.


On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

> Sounds great to me. Would love to see more feedback on the utility of the
> rsgroups feature.
>
> What ever happened to the issue that was keeping 1.3 from becoming the
> stable release line? That still outstanding for 1.4 too?
>
> On Oct 4, 2017 16:24, "Andrew Purtell" <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I had hoped to make a release candidate of 1.4.0 a long time ago when I
> > first made the branch, but work/life intervened. Sorry it has been slow
> > going.
> >
> > I've been making some test fixes to shore up unit test suite results.
> >
> > As far as big items, at this point a candidate 1.4.0 is only waiting on
> > HBASE-15631 (https://reviews.apache.org/r/60672/). I had to go away for
> > work for a while but am now back pushing that forward. For me as
> branch-1.4
> > RM regionserver assignment groups is the must have feature for the 1.4
> code
> > line. If anyone has a strong feeling against this, let's discuss it now.
> I
> > have asked before and I believe there are no objections to doing the
> > backport because the functional changes are entirely contained to the new
> > hbase-rsgroups module.
> >
> > Once HBASE-15631 is resolved I will be able to make a RC. This should be
> > soon. I've addressed all of the review feedback up on RB and anticipate
> > only minor additional changes to fix any issues discovered during unit
> and
> > cluster testing.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew

Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
decrepit hands
   - A23, Crosstalk

--94eb2c0479d636d701055ac1689d--