Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id E354F200D18 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 02:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id E1DC91609ED; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 333A21609EA for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 02:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 97539 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2017 00:41:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 97525 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2017 00:41:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 942E518142F for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_dSI5TM9Prx for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A10FA60D9C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A4CA9E0F72 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1D24E24292 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Appy (JIRA)" To: dev@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HBASE-18884) Coprocessor Design Improvements 2 (Follow up of HBASE-17732) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 00:41:11 -0000 Appy created HBASE-18884: ---------------------------- Summary: Coprocessor Design Improvements 2 (Follow up of HBASE-17732) Key: HBASE-18884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18884 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Appy Assignee: Appy Creating new jira to track suggestions that came in review (https://reviews.apache.org/r/62141/) but are not blocker and can be done separately. Suggestions by [~apurtell] - Change {{Service Coprocessor#getService()}} to {{List Coprocessor#getServices()}} - I think we overstepped by offering [table resource management via this interface|https://github.com/apache/hbase/blob/master/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/CoprocessorEnvironment.java#L57]. There are a lot of other internal resource types which could/should be managed this way but they are all left up to the implementor. Perhaps we should remove the table ref management and leave it up to them as well. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)