hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] is hbase-spark integration going to make it into HBase 2.0
Date Thu, 14 Sep 2017 11:18:11 GMT
If no one is working on it, having it in a different repo doesn't get it to
downstream any faster.

On Sep 13, 2017 9:57 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> If we leave it in the master branch, does that mean the code would not be
> transferred to additional ASF repo ?
>
> If so, that implies the hbase-spark module would not face user for extended
> period of time.
>
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Is a formal vote needed?
> >
> > Looks like consensus to me; at least on it not making 2.0.
> >
> > Seems easiest in the short term to leave it in the master branch, unless
> > some folks are ready to make a push. That puts off deciding how some
> > separate repo logistics work in hopes we can skip them.
> >
> > On Sep 13, 2017 9:37 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Several days passed.
> > >
> > > Sean:
> > > Can you start a VOTE thread ?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > My (potentially ignorant) understanding would be that the Spark
> > > > integration is a good candidate to separate out into its own release
> > > cycle.
> > > > I can't think of a reason we'd need to keep it in the main tree in
> > terms
> > > of
> > > > HBase Java API (it would only rely on public API stuff, right?).
> > > >
> > > > The lack of folks with time and expertise makes me think that a
> > separate
> > > > release cycle makes me think that's the right call.
> > > >
> > > > On 9/10/17 4:16 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> bq. revisit the possibility of an independent release cycle run out
> of
> > > an
> > > >> additional ASF repo.
> > > >>
> > > >> This seems to be more practical than the other alternatives.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi Folks!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Our Stack recently gave an updated timeline on HBase 2.0 related
> > > >>> releases [1] that has us quickly approaching feature freeze for
> beta
> > > >>> releases.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Previously, we had a great discussion on what it takes for our
> > > >>> hbase-spark integration to be ready for release[2]. (see the
> summary
> > > >>> in the scope document I put up on [3]).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Unfortunately, since the start of August my day to day tasks have
> > > >>> pulled me away from focusing on chasing down the goals in the
scope
> > > >>> document. Additionally it seems, to me at least, that other folks
> are
> > > >>> similarly focused on other things.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is there anyone with enough cycles to work through the milestones
> > > >>> called out in the scope document in time for deadlines that AFAICT
> > are
> > > >>> measured in a handful of weeks?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If not I suggest we either start pulling things out and aim for
the
> > > >>> 2.1 release, or revisit the possibility of an independent release
> > > >>> cycle run out of an additional ASF repo.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]: https://s.apache.org/wedV
> > > >>> [2]: https://s.apache.org/O53T
> > > >>> [3]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18405
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message