hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dima Spivak <dimaspi...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Helper tool / checklist to facilitate RC testing coverage?
Date Mon, 18 Sep 2017 19:36:05 GMT
Big +1. I opened HBASE-16559 to start working on this last year, but then
life happened.

-Dima

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:

> bq. have some kind of dashboard where people could "sign up" to test
> different things on that checklist
>
> This makes sense.
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Misty Stanley-Jones <misty@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I keep feeling like we need a checklist for all the different things that
> > should be tested when people vote on a release candidate. Not everyone
> > needs to do all the checks, but probably at least someone should be doing
> > each of the following (and maybe things I am forgetting):
> >
> > - Binary .tar.gz and .zip extract
> > - Source .tar.gz and .zip extract
> > - All md5sums match
> > - The source .tar.gz matches the hash on the Git repo
> > - Everything is signed correctly
> > - The source compiles into exactly the binary
> > - The source compiles with both OpenJDK and Oracle JDK (?)
> > - The binaries from the binary .tar.gz and .zip run as expected
> > - The binaries built from the source .tar.gz and .zip run as expected
> > - The standard tests all run and pass, with the exception of known
> flakies
> > - LTT and PE tools run and look good
> >
> >
> > Would it be helpful to have some kind of dashboard where people could
> "sign
> > up" to test different things on that checklist, and maybe to require that
> > all the checks have been done by at least someone before the RC can be
> > released? Maybe it could be something silly like a Google Form, even. Or
> a
> > spreadsheet.
> >
> > I think it might also be less intimidating for newbies who have never
> voted
> > on an RC before (and we really really want as many people as possible to
> > participate in the voting process).
> >
> > What do y'all think?
> >
> > Misty
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message