hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving 2.0 forward
Date Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:39:37 GMT
I set HBASE-18169 as a Blocker because I found some critial problems on our
current CPs. The semantics are broken. Although we are allowed to break CP
in a major release, I think we need to provide the same ability(in another
way).

2017-07-25 1:25 GMT+08:00 Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org>:

>
>
> On 7/21/17 12:03 PM, Stack wrote:
>
>> Status update girls and boys!
>>
>> hbase-2.0.0-alpha1 went out June 22nd.
>>
>> alpha2 has been a bit slow to follow (holidays) though there has been
>> steady progress closing out blockers and criticals by a bunch of you all.
>> The plan is for a release in the first week or so of August. It should be
>> fully up on hbase-thirdparty using updated (and relocated) versions of
>> netty, guava, and protobuf as well as a default deploy that has
>> master-carrying-no-regions.
>>
>> alpha3 will follow soon after and will focus on making sure our
>> user-facing
>> APIs are clean (branch-1 compatible, no illicit removals/mods, and so on)
>> and that basic upgrade 'works'.
>>
>> betas start in September?
>>
>> I've been keeping a rough general state here [1] (please update any
>> section
>> that is lagging actuality) but for details on what blockers and criticals
>> remain, see the JIRA 2.0 view [2]. Recent issue-gardening has brought 2.0
>> into better focus. Feel free to review and punt items you think can wait
>> till 3.0 or 2.1. If you want to pull in more stuff, please ask first.
>>
>
> Chia-Ping (I think? -- JIRA is being a pain) had asked on the space-quota
> phase2 work (include size of hbase snapshots in a table's "quota usage") if
> we should try to also include that work in 2.0.
>
> I like the idea of this also hitting 2.0 as it would make the feature a
> bit more "real", but am obviously a little nervous (I have no reason to be
> nervous though). I am pretty happy with the feature in terms of how much it
> is covered via testing.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17748
>
>
> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>> 1.
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9i
>> Eu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#
>> 2. https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HBASE/versions/12327188
>>
>
> - Josh
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message