hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] First hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 Release Candidate is available
Date Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:19:47 GMT
Hi Stack,

Can you mark jira version 2.0.0-alpha-1 as released?

Thanks,
Mike

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> With 4 binding votes and 1 non-binding, vote passes. Let me push out the
> alpha.
> Thanks to all who voted.
> St.Ack
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > Great. Thanks Sean. In-line...
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> details below, a few things to clean up for later alpha/betas.
> >>
> >> * checksums are all good
> >> * signatures are made with two different keys. should clean up by next
> >> alpha.
> >>
> >> src / bin artifacts are signed with 8ACC93D2, as you mentioned in the
> >> VOTE. However, this key is not in our project's KEYS file.
> >>
> >>
> > Yes. Will fix.
> >
> >
> >> maven staged repository are signed with 30CD0996, which is in our KEYS
> >> file so those check out fine.
> >>
> >> * the tag 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0 does point to
> >> c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc, which matches the source
> >> artifact after accounting HBASE-13088
> >>
> >> The tag isn't signed; would be good to make sure we do tag signing in
> >> betas so that it's ready to go come GA time.
> >>
> >>
> > Next time through, I'll update our 'How to RC' doc and will add above.
> >
> >
> >
> >> (side note, it would be good to get a decision on HBASE-13088 for the
> >> beta releases. been over 2 years)
> >>
> >> * the source tarball creates a binary assembly that looks as close to
> >> the posted binary artifact as I've seen branch-1 do.
> >>
> >> idle interest, but our binary convenience artifact has jumped from
> >> ~100MiB in branch-1 release to ~160MiB. If anyone has time to dig in
> >> on why, probably worth checking. (e.g. the docs directory is ~585 MiB
> >> when untared.)
> >>
> >>
> > Yes. Its obnoxious (HBASE-18208).
> >
> >
> >> * shaded artifact binaries are a reasonable number of MiB in size
> >> (incorrect build flags will result in ~empty jars)
> >>
> >> * LICENSE/NOTICE spot check looks okay.
> >>
> >> we have a ton of places where we have velocity variables instead of
> >> copyright years, but IIRC that's a problem on branch-1 right now too.
> >>
> >> * CHANGES file hasn't been updated correctly
> >>
> >> currently has details for 0.93.
> >>
> >>
> > Will fix next time through.
> >
> > Thanks Sean,
> > S
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-alpha-1 is up at:
> >> >>
> >> >>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-
> alpha-1RC0/
> >> >>
> >> >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> >> >>
> >> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >> hbase-1169
> >> >>
> >> >> All was signed w/ my key 8ACC93D2
> >> >> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2>
> >> >>
> >> >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0
> >> >> (c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc).
> >> >>
> >> >> hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 will be our first 2.0.0 release. It is a rough
> cut
> >> >> ('alpha') not-for-production preview of what hbase-2.0.0 will look
> >> like. It
> >> >> is what we used to call a 'Developer' release[1] meant mostly for
> devs
> >> and
> >> >> downstreamers to test drive and flag us early if we there are issues
> >> we’ve
> >> >> missed ahead of our rolling a production-worthy release.
> >> >>
> >> >> hbase-2.0.0 includes a fleet of new features that include a new
> >> assignment
> >> >> manager, means for keeping read and write path off-heap, in-memory
> >> >> compactions, and more. I have been keeping a running doc on the state
> >> of
> >> >> 2.0.0 here [2]. There is much to do still (see aforementioned doc).
> >> >>
> >> >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [4].
> >> There
> >> >> are about 2500. The list of ~500 fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be
> >> found
> >> >> here [3].
> >> >>
> >> >> Please take it for a spin and vote on whether it ok to put out as our
> >> first
> >> >> alpha (bar is low for an 'alpha'). Let the VOTE be open for 24 hours.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> St.Ack
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning.pre10
> >> >> 2.
> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_
> >> >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#heading=h.v21r9nz8g01j
> >> >> 3.
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17852?jql=
> >> >> project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.
> >> >> 0.0%20and%20fixVersion%20not%20in%20(1.0.0%2C%201.0.1%2C%
> >> >> 201.0.2%2C%201.0.3%2C%201.0.4%2C%201.0.5%2C%201.0.6%2C%201.
> >> >> 1.0%2C%201.1.1%2C%201.1.2%2C%201.1.3%2C%201.1.4%2C%201.1.5%
> >> >> 2C%201.1.6%2C%201.1.7%2C%201.1.8%2C%201.1.9%2C%201.1.10%2C%
> >> >> 201.2.0%2C%201.2.1%2C%201.2.2%2C%201.2.3%2C%201.2.4%2C%201.
> >> >> 2.5%2C%201.2.6%2C%201.3.0%2C%201.3.1%2C%201.4.0)%20and%20%
> >> >> 20(status%20%3D%20Open%20or%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%
> 20Available%22)
> >> >> 4.
> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18191?jql=
> >> >> project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D%
> >> >> 202.0.0)%20and%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved)
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best regards,
> >> >
> >> >    - Andy
> >> >
> >> > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. -
> Raymond
> >> > Teller (via Peter Watts)
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message