hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 Release Candidate is available
Date Sat, 10 Jun 2017 18:40:01 GMT
Great. Thanks Sean. In-line...

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> details below, a few things to clean up for later alpha/betas.
>
> * checksums are all good
> * signatures are made with two different keys. should clean up by next
> alpha.
>
> src / bin artifacts are signed with 8ACC93D2, as you mentioned in the
> VOTE. However, this key is not in our project's KEYS file.
>
>
Yes. Will fix.


> maven staged repository are signed with 30CD0996, which is in our KEYS
> file so those check out fine.
>
> * the tag 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0 does point to
> c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc, which matches the source
> artifact after accounting HBASE-13088
>
> The tag isn't signed; would be good to make sure we do tag signing in
> betas so that it's ready to go come GA time.
>
>
Next time through, I'll update our 'How to RC' doc and will add above.



> (side note, it would be good to get a decision on HBASE-13088 for the
> beta releases. been over 2 years)
>
> * the source tarball creates a binary assembly that looks as close to
> the posted binary artifact as I've seen branch-1 do.
>
> idle interest, but our binary convenience artifact has jumped from
> ~100MiB in branch-1 release to ~160MiB. If anyone has time to dig in
> on why, probably worth checking. (e.g. the docs directory is ~585 MiB
> when untared.)
>
>
Yes. Its obnoxious (HBASE-18208).


> * shaded artifact binaries are a reasonable number of MiB in size
> (incorrect build flags will result in ~empty jars)
>
> * LICENSE/NOTICE spot check looks okay.
>
> we have a ton of places where we have velocity variables instead of
> copyright years, but IIRC that's a problem on branch-1 right now too.
>
> * CHANGES file hasn't been updated correctly
>
> currently has details for 0.93.
>
>
Will fix next time through.

Thanks Sean,
S



> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> The first release candidate for HBase 2.0.0-alpha-1 is up at:
> >>
> >>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1RC0/
> >>
> >> Maven artifacts are available from a staging directory here:
> >>
> >>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1169
> >>
> >> All was signed w/ my key 8ACC93D2
> >> <http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9816C7FC8ACC93D2>
> >>
> >> I tagged the RC as 2.0.0-alpha-1RC0
> >> (c830a0f47f58d4892dd3300032c8244d6278aecc).
> >>
> >> hbase-2.0.0-alpha-1 will be our first 2.0.0 release. It is a rough cut
> >> ('alpha') not-for-production preview of what hbase-2.0.0 will look
> like. It
> >> is what we used to call a 'Developer' release[1] meant mostly for devs
> and
> >> downstreamers to test drive and flag us early if we there are issues
> we’ve
> >> missed ahead of our rolling a production-worthy release.
> >>
> >> hbase-2.0.0 includes a fleet of new features that include a new
> assignment
> >> manager, means for keeping read and write path off-heap, in-memory
> >> compactions, and more. I have been keeping a running doc on the state of
> >> 2.0.0 here [2]. There is much to do still (see aforementioned doc).
> >>
> >> The list of features addressed in 2.0.0 so far can be found here [4].
> There
> >> are about 2500. The list of ~500 fixes in 2.0.0 exclusively can be found
> >> here [3].
> >>
> >> Please take it for a spin and vote on whether it ok to put out as our
> first
> >> alpha (bar is low for an 'alpha'). Let the VOTE be open for 24 hours.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >> 1. http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbase.versioning.pre10
> >> 2.
> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9iEu_
> >> ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#heading=h.v21r9nz8g01j
> >> 3.
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17852?jql=
> >> project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.
> >> 0.0%20and%20fixVersion%20not%20in%20(1.0.0%2C%201.0.1%2C%
> >> 201.0.2%2C%201.0.3%2C%201.0.4%2C%201.0.5%2C%201.0.6%2C%201.
> >> 1.0%2C%201.1.1%2C%201.1.2%2C%201.1.3%2C%201.1.4%2C%201.1.5%
> >> 2C%201.1.6%2C%201.1.7%2C%201.1.8%2C%201.1.9%2C%201.1.10%2C%
> >> 201.2.0%2C%201.2.1%2C%201.2.2%2C%201.2.3%2C%201.2.4%2C%201.
> >> 2.5%2C%201.2.6%2C%201.3.0%2C%201.3.1%2C%201.4.0)%20and%20%
> >> 20(status%20%3D%20Open%20or%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22)
> >> 4.
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18191?jql=
> >> project%20%3D%20HBASE%20%20and%20(%20fixVersion%20%3D%
> >> 202.0.0)%20and%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
> > Teller (via Peter Watts)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message