Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B1B200C7F for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 00:29:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 2540B160BC3; Tue, 9 May 2017 22:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9028A160BB6 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 00:29:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 55854 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2017 22:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 55836 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2017 22:29:04 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 May 2017 22:29:04 +0000 Received: from hw10447.local (unknown [167.102.188.146]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 028461A031E for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 22:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <591242AF.5000405@apache.org> Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 18:29:03 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@hbase.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge space quota branch (HBASE-16961) into master References: <590D0995.1030205@apache.org> <5911E325.9010207@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Tue, 09 May 2017 22:29:06 -0000 I won't pretend to be involved enough in the 2.0 work to give an opinion :) -- I did say earlier that I'm happy to land this in 2.0 or 3.0 (whatever master decides to be at the time I merge). If the spirit of the voters is to include this in 3.0 and not 2.0, that's fine by me. I'm also happy to not immediately merge after this vote completes. Andrew Purtell wrote: > Would it help to cut a branch for 2.0 before attempting to merge in a new > major feature? > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Josh Elser wrote: > >> Reminder: I hope to close this in ~30hrs and there have been no votes so >> far. >> >> >> Josh Elser wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> This is a vote to (rebase and) merge the branch HBASE-16961 into master. >>> Per the book, this requires 3 binding +1's from other committers to merge. >>> >>> Relevant info for those who want to revisit any topics: >>> >>> DISCUSS on merge[1] >>> Design Doc[2] >>> Staged user manual[3] >>> >>> I'll plan to leave this open for at least 72hrs of the work days >>> (Wednesday May 10th EOD) in case there are any vetos. I would prefer to >>> abstain from voting on my own feature and plan to do so if the votes are >>> otherwise lacking. >>> >>> - Josh >>> >>> [1] >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a28c69bff315a791b9f7b94 >>> 6636446a60bd2ddc8d5a9f5c11c2bf6f4@%3Cdev.hbase.apache.org%3E >>> >>> [2] http://home.apache.org/~elserj/hbase/FileSystemQuotasforApac >>> heHBase.pdf >>> [3] https://people.apache.org/~elserj/hbase/quotas/book.html#space-quotas >>> > >