hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Status of the 0.98 release line
Date Mon, 10 Apr 2017 19:08:03 GMT
I agree we should EOL 0.98.
St.Ack

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
wrote:

> Please speak up if it is incorrect to interpret the lack of responses as
> indicating consensus on declaring 0.98 EOL.
>
> I believe we should declare 0.98 EOL.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:56 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Folks!
> >
> > Back in January our Andrew Purtell stepped down as the release
> > manager for the 0.98 release line.
> >
> > On the resultant dev@hbase thread[1] folks seemed largely in favor of
> > declaring end-of-maintenance for the 0.98 line.
> >
> > Now that it's been a couple of months, does anyone have concerns about
> > pushing forward on that?
> >
> > Do folks who listen on user@hbase but not dev@hbase have any concerns?
> >
> > As with any end-of-maintenance branch, the PMC would consider on a
> > case-by-case basis doing a future release of the branch should a
> > critical security vulnerability show up.
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://s.apache.org/DjCi
> >
> > -busbey
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
> Teller (via Peter Watts)
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message