hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for HBase 1.3.1 (RC0) is available
Date Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:54:11 GMT
No objections.
Looks like Phoenix will be good. They will use the strings directly (for a
while)

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Yu Li,
>
> I think with that finding we can strike RC0 down and I'll roll RC1.
>
> Objections?
>
> -Mikhail
>
> On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:41 AM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks all for the input, I've just committed HBASE-17886 into master and
> > branch-1.3.
> >
> > For branch-1.2 the commit suspends and will wait for Sean's response.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yu
> >
> > On 6 April 2017 at 16:50, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > My bad on not checking compatibility report here.
> > >
> > > I think leaving unified metric names in place is conceptually right
> thing
> > > to do, with having old names as proxies, so I'd be +1 on v2 patch to
> > > HBASE-17886.
> > >
> > > Then we can strike down rc0 and immediately roll rc1.
> > >
> > > Regarding 1.2.5.1, it's up to Sean to decide, but I personally don't
> feel
> > > this issue warrants immediate cut of hotfix release when 1.2.6 is
> > probably
> > > not that far away (it's not dataloss bug or security vulnerability).
> > >
> > > -Mikhail
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 1:15 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I committed that patch. It was for phoenix folks. In review I
> misjudged
> > > the
> > > > public statics in ServerSideScanMetrics as for internal only. My
> > mistake.
> > > > Agree that it a compat breaker. Sorry for making more work. I put a
> > > > question up on the phoenix dev list asking if they depend on this
> being
> > > in
> > > > a 1.3.1 at least.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:25 AM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I have attached the screenshot of the report onto HBASE-17886, FYI
> > boss
> > > > > @Mikhail
> > > > >
> > > > > I think this is also an issue for branch-1.2 although 1.2.5 is
> > already
> > > > > released, and supporting both names and (add-back and) mark the old
> > one
> > > > > deprecated as per Duo suggested in 17886 might be a good idea?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Yu
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6 April 2017 at 14:42, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hmm. Looks like this change has already went out in 1.2.5 though,
> > > > looking
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > > > > > version=12338339&projectId=12310753
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Those the compat report posted there on the RC is no longer
> > available
> > > > (we
> > > > > > can re-run it).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Should we revert it in 1.2.6 back then, or leave as is?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
> > > olorinbant@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Yu Li!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You picture doesn't load for me, could you repost? I'll
run
> > > > > compatibility
> > > > > > > checker too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Mikhail
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> -1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Checked sums and signatures: ok
> > > > > > >> Built from source: ok (7u79)
> > > > > > >> RAT check passed: ok (7u79)
> > > > > > >> Compatibility check: Failed
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> ‚Äč
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Checked the commit history and the above issue is introduced
> by
> > > > > > >> HBASE-17716, and have opened HBASE-17886 to fix it.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Best Regards,
> > > > > > >> Yu
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On 6 April 2017 at 07:38, Mikhail Antonov <antonov@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Hello everyone,
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> I'm pleased to announce the first release candidate
for
> Apache
> > > > HBase
> > > > > > >>> 1.3.1 is
> > > > > > >>> available to download and testing.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Artifacts are available here:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/1.3.1RC0/
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Maven artifacts are available in the staging repository:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> > > > > hbase-1165
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> All artifacts are signed with my code signing key
35A4ABE2,
> > which
> > > > is
> > > > > > also
> > > > > > >>> in the project KEYS file at
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> these artifacts correspond to commit hash
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> 2a425fc420a3de98eedd2ee7b703bb2873127f0e tagged
as 1.3.1RC0.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> HBase 1.3.1 is the first maintenance release in
the HBase
> 1.3.z
> > > > > release
> > > > > > >>> line,
> > > > > > >>> continuing on the theme of bringing a stable, reliable
> database
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> Hadoop and NoSQL communities. This release includes
67
> resolved
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > >>> since the initial 1.3.0 release that was 3 month
ago.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> The full list of issues addressed is available
at
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> > > > > > >>> ctId=12310753&version=12335746
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> and also in the CHANGES.txt file in the root directory
of the
> > > > source
> > > > > > >>> tarball.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Please take a few minutes to verify the release
and vote on
> > > > > > >>> releasing it:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache HBase 1.3.1
> > > > > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > >>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> This Vote will run for one week and close Wed Apr
12, 2017
> > 22:00
> > > > PST.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks ! (also separate thanks to Andrew Purtell
for the help
> > to
> > > > get
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > >>> RC
> > > > > > >>> out)
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> -Mikhail Antonov
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Michael Antonov
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Michael Antonov
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michael Antonov
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - Raymond
Teller (via Peter Watts)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message