Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F5C200C40 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:45:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 163C2160B83; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:45:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 83CBB160B68 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:45:23 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 39546 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2017 17:45:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 39525 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2017 17:45:21 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:45:21 +0000 Received: from hw10447.local (unknown [167.102.188.146]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 18FE11A0193 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <58D409AA.40701@apache.org> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:45:14 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving towards merge on HBASE-16961 (space quota) References: <58D0496E.4060101@apache.org> <58D05CF4.7050705@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <58D05CF4.7050705@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:45:24 -0000 bump Josh Elser wrote: > Rebase is done for those who want to just look at some code. > > https://github.com/apache/hbase/compare/HBASE-16961 > > Josh Elser wrote: >> Hiya folks, >> >> As advertised (warned? *winks*), all of the sub-tasks on HBASE-16961 >> have been resolved after being committed to the HBASE-16961 branch in >> SCM. >> >> While Ted has been a stalwart reviewer, it would be good to get another >> set of eyes (or a few sets) on the changes before considering I start a >> vote to merge into master. >> >> Presently, I'm rebasing the branch on top of master (as it's been a >> while since I've done that). While I do that, I wanted to ask: what can >> I do to help make this review process easiest? >> >> * Squash commits into one and put on RB? >> * Pointers to tests that outline how users interact via API? >> * Put together a little example devs can work through locally? >> >> I want to avoid this work lingering in the ether for a long period of >> time -- I'm happy to try to make what will surely be a difficult review >> any easier. >> >> - Josh