hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Moving 2.0 forward
Date Tue, 07 Mar 2017 02:15:25 GMT
Thanks Stack for the nice writeup.

I think we should shoot for an alpha release sooner than 2 months. It gives
a test target, and will be a great way to test-drive and push for the
release vehicles (packing, hadoop3, license issues, etc) and also create
some well-deserved excitement. I can help with that.

Enis

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > ...
> > + No recent work on core decision tasks (clean-up narrative around RPC
> > timeout, hbase:meta on master or not, batch vs partial semantic, etc.)
> >
> >
> Correction. batch vs partial semantic is making goodprogress (HBASE-15484).
> S
>
>
>
>
> > Non-criticals/Ancillaries
> >
> > + Async client and C++ client are both making good progress. Not done.
> > + Backup/Restore is making good progress
> > + RegionServer-based assignment got a bunch of scrutiny lately and is now
> > 'done'.
> > + FileSystem Quotas making good progress.
> >
> > I'm seeing another month or two at least before branch and probably
> three.
> > See doc [1] for more detail.
> >
> > Yours,
> > St.Ack
> >
> > 1.  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9
> > iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:49 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
> >> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi All
> >>>
> >>> Thanks Stack. The doc looks great. The offheap write path/read path- I
> >>> think from the read path perspective we have some good feedback from
> >>> Alibaba folks.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Agree.
> >>
> >>
> >>> The write path subtasks are all done. We are currently working on some
> >>> perf
> >>> results that would help us to come up with some docs that suggests best
> >>> configs and tunings for the offheap write path configurations.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Thanks Ram. Would be good to hear what configs you are looking to
> >> implement as default so those of us also starting to test can enable
> them
> >> to get you feedback.
> >>
> >> Also suggest you fill the above short status into the doc (You are
> >> keeping up full status elsewhere). I've been trying to add status as I
> see
> >> it popping up; e.g. Enis did a nice state-of-the-C++ client recently up
> in
> >> JIRA and I added pointer to the 2.0 doc. Anyone else working on 2.0
> >> features, would be good if you kept a short state in this overview doc;
> >> just ask for edit perms.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> St.Ack
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Ram
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Purtell <
> >>> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > I'm interested in both split meta and rsgroups. Good news. I'd like
> to
> >>> > help test.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Francis Liu <toffer@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Hi Stack,
> >>> > >> I'd like to get split meta (HBASE-112288) in 2.x as well.
I can
> >>> have a
> >>> > 2.x
> >>> > >> draft up next week. Was working on the 1.x version internally.
> >>> > >> Also if you'd like I can be the owner for rsgroups as well.
> >>> > >> Thanks,Francis
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> I added splitting meta as a possible and had you and I as
owner on
> >>> > > rsgroups (I was doing to do a bit of testing and doc for this
> >>> feature).
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Would love to see splittable meta show up. Needs to be rolling
> >>> > upgradeable
> >>> > > though. Lets chat up on the issue.
> >>> > > St.Ack
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>    On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:29 AM, Stack <
> stack@duboce.net
> >>> >
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Done Thiruvel (And thanks Guanghao for adding hbase-replication).
> >>> > >> St.Ack
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Thiruvel Thirumoolan <
> >>> > >> thiruvel@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>> Hi Stack,
> >>> > >>> I would like to add Favored Nodes to the ancillary section.
> >>> > >>> HBASE-15531: Favored Nodes EnhancementsStatus: Active
> >>> > development.Owner:
> >>> > >>> Thiruvel Thanks!-Thiruvel
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>   On Monday, January 16, 2017 2:10 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Guanghao Zhang <
> >>> zghaobac@gmail.com>
> >>> > >>> wrote:
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>> For 6. Significant contirbs in master only, there
are some
> issues
> >>> > about
> >>> > >>>> replication operations routed through master. They
are sub-task
> >>> > >>>> of HBASE-10504. And there are other umbrella issue
for
> >>> replication,
> >>> > >> like
> >>> > >>>> HBase-14379 Replication V2 and HBASE-15867 Moving
HBase
> >>> Replication
> >>> > >>>> tracking from Zookeeper to HBase. So i thought we
can add a new
> >>> > section
> >>> > >>>> named
> >>> > >>>> hbase-replication to possible 2.0.0s. This will help
us to track
> >>> the
> >>> > >>> state.
> >>> > >>>> Thanks.
> >>> > >>>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>> Thanks Guanghao Zhang. I agree. I made you an editor.
If you want
> >>> to
> >>> > >> have a
> >>> > >>> go at a first cut, be my guest. If nothing done in the
next day
> or
> >>> so,
> >>> > >> I'll
> >>> > >>> add this section Sir.
> >>> > >>> Thanks,
> >>> > >>> M
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message