hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stack <st...@duboce.net>
Subject Re: Moving 2.0 forward
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:54:54 GMT
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> ...
> + No recent work on core decision tasks (clean-up narrative around RPC
> timeout, hbase:meta on master or not, batch vs partial semantic, etc.)
>
>
Correction. batch vs partial semantic is making goodprogress (HBASE-15484).
S




> Non-criticals/Ancillaries
>
> + Async client and C++ client are both making good progress. Not done.
> + Backup/Restore is making good progress
> + RegionServer-based assignment got a bunch of scrutiny lately and is now
> 'done'.
> + FileSystem Quotas making good progress.
>
> I'm seeing another month or two at least before branch and probably three.
> See doc [1] for more detail.
>
> Yours,
> St.Ack
>
> 1.  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WCsVlnHjJeKUcl7wHwqb4z9
> iEu_ktczrlKHK8N4SZzs/edit#
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 9:16 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:49 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan <
>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> Thanks Stack. The doc looks great. The offheap write path/read path- I
>>> think from the read path perspective we have some good feedback from
>>> Alibaba folks.
>>>
>>
>> Agree.
>>
>>
>>> The write path subtasks are all done. We are currently working on some
>>> perf
>>> results that would help us to come up with some docs that suggests best
>>> configs and tunings for the offheap write path configurations.
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks Ram. Would be good to hear what configs you are looking to
>> implement as default so those of us also starting to test can enable them
>> to get you feedback.
>>
>> Also suggest you fill the above short status into the doc (You are
>> keeping up full status elsewhere). I've been trying to add status as I see
>> it popping up; e.g. Enis did a nice state-of-the-C++ client recently up in
>> JIRA and I added pointer to the 2.0 doc. Anyone else working on 2.0
>> features, would be good if you kept a short state in this overview doc;
>> just ask for edit perms.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> St.Ack
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Ram
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:37 AM, Andrew Purtell <
>>> andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm interested in both split meta and rsgroups. Good news. I'd like to
>>> > help test.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Francis Liu <toffer@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi Stack,
>>> > >> I'd like to get split meta (HBASE-112288) in 2.x as well. I can
>>> have a
>>> > 2.x
>>> > >> draft up next week. Was working on the 1.x version internally.
>>> > >> Also if you'd like I can be the owner for rsgroups as well.
>>> > >> Thanks,Francis
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I added splitting meta as a possible and had you and I as owner
on
>>> > > rsgroups (I was doing to do a bit of testing and doc for this
>>> feature).
>>> > >
>>> > > Would love to see splittable meta show up. Needs to be rolling
>>> > upgradeable
>>> > > though. Lets chat up on the issue.
>>> > > St.Ack
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>    On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 11:29 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Done Thiruvel (And thanks Guanghao for adding hbase-replication).
>>> > >> St.Ack
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Thiruvel Thirumoolan <
>>> > >> thiruvel@yahoo-inc.com.invalid> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Hi Stack,
>>> > >>> I would like to add Favored Nodes to the ancillary section.
>>> > >>> HBASE-15531: Favored Nodes EnhancementsStatus: Active
>>> > development.Owner:
>>> > >>> Thiruvel Thanks!-Thiruvel
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>   On Monday, January 16, 2017 2:10 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Guanghao Zhang <
>>> zghaobac@gmail.com>
>>> > >>> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>> For 6. Significant contirbs in master only, there are some
issues
>>> > about
>>> > >>>> replication operations routed through master. They are
sub-task
>>> > >>>> of HBASE-10504. And there are other umbrella issue for
>>> replication,
>>> > >> like
>>> > >>>> HBase-14379 Replication V2 and HBASE-15867 Moving HBase
>>> Replication
>>> > >>>> tracking from Zookeeper to HBase. So i thought we can add
a new
>>> > section
>>> > >>>> named
>>> > >>>> hbase-replication to possible 2.0.0s. This will help us
to track
>>> the
>>> > >>> state.
>>> > >>>> Thanks.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Thanks Guanghao Zhang. I agree. I made you an editor. If you
want
>>> to
>>> > >> have a
>>> > >>> go at a first cut, be my guest. If nothing done in the next
day or
>>> so,
>>> > >> I'll
>>> > >>> add this section Sir.
>>> > >>> Thanks,
>>> > >>> M
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message