Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3AC200C01 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:14:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 58CA3160B54; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A291F160B3A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:14:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23005 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2017 19:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 22994 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2017 19:14:38 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3DF9FC05B4 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KiOHBDuPaYov for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 80E955FB79 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C790CE136B for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 606B92527F for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:26 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ted Yu (JIRA)" To: dev@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HBASE-17495) TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush#testFlushCacheWhileScanning intermittently fails due to assertion error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:14:40 -0000 Ted Yu created HBASE-17495: ------------------------------ Summary: TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush#testFlushCacheWhileScanning intermittently fails due to assertion error Key: HBASE-17495 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17495 Project: HBase Issue Type: Test Reporter: Ted Yu Looping through the test (based on commit 76dc957f64fa38ce88694054db7dbf590f368ae7), I saw the following test failure: {code} testFlushCacheWhileScanning(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegionWithInMemoryFlush) Time elapsed: 0.53 sec <<< FAILURE! java.lang.AssertionError: toggle=false i=940 ts=1484852861597 expected:<94> but was:<92> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88) at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834) at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645) at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestHRegion.testFlushCacheWhileScanning(TestHRegion.java:3533) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50) at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:47) at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17) {code} See test output for details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)