Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634E200C0D for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 06:01:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 84CA9160B4D; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AB9F2160B41 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 06:01:00 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 23384 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2017 05:00:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 23364 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2017 05:00:59 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:00:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E20421A058B for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:00:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.398 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0q7UjPHyoPEB for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:00:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DAE9B5F4A7 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l66so106924127ioi.1 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:00:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aPVQlTFH/+UoS0jo2zyux6ulphfDnDhS9MHYKnGHqEw=; b=LpNBh6OtP8TfCmnttKzLawi3kjOi3wt794OLgPwfJWMs+IWkYTcb6hAxfMt/KLZqEn yX4hfiwgojh5q/f+/91ZLfeiUi0MAJhC2TxUu0x/qWvwP1rCU/BjOGs3D2OjgMrPvJhO Avz1Ix6py+0RozeIZGm6T2+lgA95Lx+UjQm3INI0+0QxBDCqdM7kZlzlXD5qNsHC5JGj k1CTfriai61WNkWaTlMifY5CiMt90j0R7Vu7hilw8+hqRLklpRtlWNmbKhePUvtnrEqB 6UIxy0HWGshh8TWJDc1/6GnNTfa3NzKrgiJB7sP6QpmMRtdI3kyV2aDV0dXkAykCv381 gauw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=aPVQlTFH/+UoS0jo2zyux6ulphfDnDhS9MHYKnGHqEw=; b=fRnEx9+OYxq/MVAQQZe7C2SRAEPa6yDL/hFCddXa8E42gxXVAYqE1GG3Vhw5PPOLWa bSRDa69URWfeqLoQ+ia6+6fvvFdlljcs9pGP3/Q5Vc5GMWIkE/mEQ7hDg8oF4j+oIDI+ UoN8Go/AbDb2TuH7FK2UWieM5Npui2UBS1x+EUvaDgKhZlvMavlqjKu5ZVLZc9bS0ma9 HK9RShPahvszuKRTox1nb885KKErIsxr83ur03mkvYRO2iFnCdaQJ7qIbyfFyg9woBGD 7NhE5X7ubhUoh+tUG734+GKO1g1vcj9emjF9ElRMawwmWt5xV5M2kcqQIDRKxO3KPHga 5Y0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK3lItXaIopiOWz+VHrcVGl4hkldjaaJvslTQzw7Nfowv/kBbrv5RtwuhbsM1dYhr0nS86E68YsnTlyOw== X-Received: by 10.107.26.205 with SMTP id a196mr34941106ioa.214.1484629249292; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:00:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.122.74 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:00:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <587CFB8F.7090308@apache.org> References: <587CFB8F.7090308@apache.org> From: ramkrishna vasudevan Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:30:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Resignation as RM for branch 0.98 To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fd0560734c10546432ffc archived-at: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 05:01:01 -0000 --001a113fd0560734c10546432ffc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for your efforts Andrew. +1 on EOL of 0.98. On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > Big +1 to your efforts, Andrew, and an EOL on 0.98 > > > Ted Yu wrote: > >> Kudos to Andrew. >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Enis S=C3=B6ztutar wr= ote: >> >> Thanks Andrew for carrying this. >>> >>> +1 on the EOL messaging. >>> >>> Enis >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Mikhail Antonov >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah - thank you for all hard work and time investment on reviews, >>>> cherry-picking, backporting and testing Andrew! >>>> >>>> +1 to retire 0.98. >>>> >>>> -Mikhail >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Sean Busbey wrote= : >>>> >>>> Thanks for all the hard work around 0.98 Andrew! >>>>> >>>>> I'm +1 on retiring 0.98, but I think we should solicit feedback from >>>>> user@hbase before making a decision. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Andrew Purtell >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> HBasers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy new year! >>>>>> >>>>>> The 0.98 branch has had a great run at a fairly constant release >>>>>> >>>>> cadence, >>>> >>>>> producing 24 releases in all. >>>>>> >>>>>> I served as the branch RM for 98 for all of that time, and now I fee= l >>>>>> >>>>> the >>>> >>>>> time has come to move on to work with more recent code. Therefore >>>>>> >>>>> please >>>> >>>>> consider this my resignation as such (it's an informal position after >>>>>> >>>>> all >>>> >>>>> (smile)) from the role of branch 98 RM. >>>>>> >>>>>> It will be up to the PMC to decide what to do about 98 going forward= . >>>>>> >>>>> My >>>> >>>>> recommendation is to put out the message that 98 branch has been end >>>>>> >>>>> of >>> >>>> lifed (EOL). There is no reason someone else couldn't don the RM hat >>>>>> >>>>> and >>>> >>>>> put out an additional 98 release, for example, in order to deal with >>>>>> >>>>> a >>> >>>> critical fix for something we just can't abide shipping as the last >>>>>> >>>>> release >>>>> >>>>>> of anything. That person might even be me. However, without a >>>>>> >>>>> dedicated >>> >>>> shepard the management of the 98 branch is pretty difficult these >>>>>> >>>>> days. >>> >>>> It >>>>> >>>>>> requires Java 6 to build, which requires a hack to its security >>>>>> >>>>> classes >>> >>>> to >>>>> >>>>>> communicate with modern SSL servers like repository.apache.org, and >>>>>> mandates Hadoop 1 compatibility, which can lead to tricky problems >>>>>> >>>>> found >>>> >>>>> only at release time. Backports are rarely clean. Assume 30 minutes >>>>>> >>>>> to >>> >>>> 2 >>>> >>>>> hours work for each attempt at a backport, including time for tests >>>>>> >>>>> to >>> >>>> complete. Maintaining and releasing 98 branch will be a time >>>>>> >>>>> commitment. >>>> >>>>> FWIW. All that said if someone else would like to step up into the 98 >>>>>> >>>>> RM >>>> >>>>> role, then we don't need to consider calling it EOL. However, as I've >>>>>> >>>>> said, >>>>> >>>>>> that is my humble recommendation to the PMC. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> If you are given a choice, you believe you have acted freely. - >>>>>> >>>>> Raymond >>> >>>> Teller (via Peter Watts) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Michael Antonov >>>> >>>> >> --001a113fd0560734c10546432ffc--