Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHxLZBVXmM5DxUowDj2SG68egevMG0mGFWFNsFxHF+qpKHEfHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17D050CD-1DB5-4881-9B40-B006D0BB3750@gmail.com>
 <CAHxLZBWJCKd+Vd_p6RBrqZJ=8KGY2oHdsnTguwnnJxFNXKUQzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62y36iJ_bkwVKcanH0YXkHp91xcHU_KXrWOu-h-usA3n1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHxLZBVXmM5DxUowDj2SG68egevMG0mGFWFNsFxHF+qpKHEfHg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?5byg6ZOOKER1byBaaGFuZyk=?= <palomino219@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 09:24:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CAAAYAnMOQ-X0JwRKHTNjXk=6H78J7EOuGZpVqEb7zYO7Ba5GSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Status of branch-1.3
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1b0e3cf3ea8e0544fe4a14
archived-at: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 01:24:25 -0000

--94eb2c1b0e3cf3ea8e0544fe4a14
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is used
to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.

Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?

Thanks.

2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>:

> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing locally
> sporadically for me.
>
> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
> >
> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
> >
> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
> > >
> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't had
> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate if
> someone
> > > could pick this one up.
> > >
> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up again
> at
> > > the beginning of January.
> > >
> > > -Mikhail
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3? How can
> I
> > > > help? Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Michael Antonov
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>

--94eb2c1b0e3cf3ea8e0544fe4a14--