hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mikhail Antonov <olorinb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Status of branch-1.3
Date Mon, 02 Jan 2017 23:20:18 GMT
Not that I know of at the moment (there are few issues opened against 1.3
but i'd not consider them release blockers).

Thanks for the quick backport! Let me get my hands on the RC..

Thanks,
-Mikhail

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 4:53 AM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino219@gmail.com> wrote:

> HBASE-16852 has been resolved.
> Is there any other blockers?
>
> Thanks.
>
> 2017-01-01 16:08 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino219@gmail.com>:
>
> > I‘ve attached a backport patch in HBASE-16852. Can anyone help reviewing
> > it? It is only a testcase issue. Let's move on quickly to get 1.3 out.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > 2017-01-01 9:24 GMT+08:00 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino219@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Seems HBASE-16309 has only been pushed to master and branch-1. It is
> used
> >> to fix the flaky TestDefaultCompactSelection.testCompactionRatio.
> >>
> >> Could you try to see if it fix your problem on branch-1.3?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> 2017-01-01 6:01 GMT+08:00 Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> That's tracked in the jira I mentioned above. I've seen it failing
> >>> locally
> >>> sporadically for me.
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Looking at https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/HBase-1.3-JDK8/,
> >>> > TestDefaultCompactSelection
> >>> > has been passing from build #72 to #86 (the latest).
> >>> >
> >>> > Results on JDK 7 builds were similar.
> >>> >
> >>> > Do you see the test fail locally ?
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers
> >>> >
> >>> > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Mikhail Antonov <
> >>> olorinbant@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Pretty much all outstanding fixes (mostly around regressions in
> >>> > > compactions, we had multiple regressions there) have been fixed.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > HBASE-16852 is the one thing that needs to be addressed, I haven't
> >>> had
> >>> > > cycles lately go get to the bottom of it and would appreciate
if
> >>> someone
> >>> > > could pick this one up.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Other than there should be no release blockers. I'll pick it up
> >>> again at
> >>> > > the beginning of January.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > -Mikhail
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Andrew Purtell <
> >>> > andrew.purtell@gmail.com
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi all,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Where are we with getting a 1.3.0 release out of branch-1.3?
How
> >>> can I
> >>> > > > help? Thanks.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > --
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > Michael Antonov
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Michael Antonov
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,
Michael Antonov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message