Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3D3200BF1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:21:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B8D6C160B30; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B10B8160B21 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:21:21 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 41892 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2016 04:21:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 41880 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2016 04:21:20 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D9803C0186 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.32 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.32 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq8m3TjolFbE for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f180.google.com (mail-qt0-f180.google.com [209.85.216.180]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id CEB305FBC2 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f180.google.com with SMTP id p16so164263964qta.0 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:21:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=egqgReqYePeL2OQaePWYnmPVJYh73KfnVz9ahm9TRzI=; b=EmGoTM53ABWU63OTSzp4o9fMACsaA0r7u832rgTaIzXF9K8fvrEr3qhXP1vLeacnc6 M0hu5N9Fe1m4CXLYLUQniRpwZUVmLQ1rjA3uPdemsQ9eK6//aI6e+pDG9Td4GYfASdSr r/YtOSZuY077q738Dci4JS+wJtLXQNZ0iBbxciUzh7mCfk9LyUXnGDd9ehHt4n/HZ2Y/ QdvVQB8/mADSAOR2j3Us6zHpeOnybeZzFeOFxjRyEagrc8o8TARZnarVS1N/aEdgnuEe aYmMiXtDTULvGTmDiGeRRoy/ThldROzMpYeyYugrkykOFAkRmQtjiKF2vOOflmcF6oET 2qkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=egqgReqYePeL2OQaePWYnmPVJYh73KfnVz9ahm9TRzI=; b=buSJwFQyqCXN2cLUo7Hdu+RrlYD5H88l9dcSFLH43K25+OXv5yj/OIWNBSdDz4yiBK IgcHB76XwmmLw04lQ/SjvIlVkRxQQHOMw6Dbn1hiFjIDKpZkeSuazSLSpAcjXGmG81rF T6giRfNlxNYAXOsyGeFG9AdTL1+a2Gb5lHX9A6ToN5A5jbNhZ6NXVG/gCEYHPPm9OYhX HAI/3FlwJhJmfHCmyZ0ihUkodjoG+zPEneRBjagqTPvIqXf2b9qOebB4YZXGOUbmkklc 0efoRsiaLYOZ76+Bw9dLXoqLUdJW5I5qmaMPPOHepsjhEYVO+9jrm80x8vTD7+A/1NYy kwIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJpLyp22SHhOG155pqRVYjvNkJ4+6cKZoWd67cBIuHu0VQ+GFvdNTKI88+Rb+SVoAs0sWny8lG5H630DA== X-Received: by 10.237.61.176 with SMTP id i45mr3281752qtf.285.1482207672429; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:21:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.58.41 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:21:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anoop John Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:51:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: meta region written by 2.0 cannot be opened by 1.x To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable archived-at: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:21:22 -0000 So what is the conclusion here ? We agree to the fact that, when 2.0 upgrade is required, first 1.x upgrade needed (The latest stable 1.x.y version?) and then to 2.0. We have to make sure to doc this clearly for 2.0 release. Thanks.. -Anoop- On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Ted Yu wrote: > I agree. > > Just marked 15265 and 10800 incompatible change. > >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 2:38 AM, =E5=BC=A0=E9=93=8E w= rote: >> >> I think the imcompatible change is HBASE-15265? HBASE-14949 aims to fix = the >> incompatible... Just like HBASE-16189 to HBASE-10800. >> >> I think we should mark HBASE-15265 and HBASE-10800 as Incompatible Chang= e? >> >> 2016-12-07 18:29 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu : >> >>> Shouldn't HBASE-14949 be marked Incompatible Change ? >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:17 AM, =E5=BC=A0=E9=93=8E wrote: >>>> >>>> See this one >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14949 >>>> >>>> 2016-12-07 18:09 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu : >>>> >>>>> Which other features ? >>>>> Can you name them ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 2:06 AM, =E5=BC=A0=E9=93=8E wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe there are other features that require upgrading to a >>> specific >>>>>> version in each 1.x release before rolling upgrading to 2.0? I think >>>> this >>>>>> is a typical trick to add incompatible changes... >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-12-07 18:02 GMT+08:00 ramkrishna vasudevan < >>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> If its going to be a pain then we need to support writing the older >>>>> class >>>>>>> name in the FFT (trailer) and then use our internal mapping. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Anoop John >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I read the comments in the issue 16189.. This concern was raised >>>>>>>> there already.. This is what I replied there. >>>>>>>> "Ya we may need to make such a need. User on 1.x has to first >>>> upgrade >>>>>>>> (rolling upgrade supported) to latest version in 1.x and then to >>>> 2.0. >>>>>>>> This was discussed some other place also. I believe in the mail >>>>> thread >>>>>>>> where we discussed abt rolling upgrade support in 2.0" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not able to find the original mail thread which discussed abt >>>> rolling >>>>>>>> upgrade support in 2.0 Pls correct if took some thing wrong >>>> way.. >>>>>>>> Ya I agree that this way of indirection might be inconvenience >>> for >>>>>>>> users. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Anoop- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Ted Yu >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> bq. write old name only and within code we will have to map it >>>> with >>>>>> new >>>>>>>>> name. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This is a viable approach. >>>>>>>>> Even if we document upgrading to 1.2.3+, some users may not >>>> perform >>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>> step before upgrading to 2.0 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Anoop John < >>>> anoop.hbase@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Ya that bug raised by Enis was very valid.. So this means >>> when >>>>>>>>>> rolling upgrade happens, if some of the other RSs with version >>>>>> <1.2.3 >>>>>>>>>> , which is not having this fix, this issue might come up! >>>>>>>>>> How to address then? Do we need to enforce a 1.2.3+ upgrade >>>> 1st >>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>> then only 2.0 rolling upgrade? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Or else we will need to fix in 2.0.. We write the new >>>> Comparator >>>>>>>>>> class name in FFT (trunk code) To fix, we might have to >>> write >>>>> old >>>>>>>>>> name only and within code we will have to map it with new >>> name. >>>> It >>>>>>>>>> will be ugly! It can be fixed only in 3.0 may be.. But that >>> can >>>>>> make >>>>>>>>>> the rolling upgrade story easier for users.. Just saying the >>>>>>>>>> possibilities.. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Ted to bring it up again. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Anoop- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> I think when Enis reported the issue ( >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16189), in >>>> rolling >>>>>>>> upgrade >>>>>>>>>>> regions could move around. So a region created in 2.0 moved >>>> to a >>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>>>> with 1.x. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> Ram >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Stack >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Ted Yu < >>> yuzhihong@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Looking at http://hbase.apache.org/book. >>>>>> html#executing.the.0.96. >>>>>>>>>> upgrade >>>>>>>>>>>> , >>>>>>>>>>>>> there is step of running "bin/hbase upgrade -check" >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How about adding a sample hfile which contains >>>>>>>>>>>>> CellComparator$MetaCellComparator >>>>>>>>>>>>> so that the upgrade check can read and verify ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We don't support downgrade. Never have. >>>>>>>>>>>> St.Ack >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Ted Yu < >>>> yuzhihong@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The build I used yesterday didn't include HBASE-16189 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once it is included, the cluster can be downgraded >>> fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder how users would know that their existing >>>>> deployment >>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>>>>>>> HBASE-16189 >>>>> jira/browse/HBASE-16189 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> before >>>>>>>>>>>>>> upgrading to 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:29 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ramkrishna.s.vasudevan@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Ted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does your version have this fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16189 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ram >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Ted Yu < >>>>> yuzhihong@gmail.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is the assumption that hbase:meta would not split ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other thread, Francis Liu was proposing >>> supporting >>>>>>>> splittable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hbase:meta in 2.0 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 6, 2016, at 2:20 AM, =E5=BC=A0=E9=93=8E < >>>> palomino219@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could this be solved by hosting meta only on >>> master? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW, MetaCellComparator is introduced in >>>> HBASE-10800. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-12-06 17:44 GMT+08:00 Ted Yu < >>>>> yuzhihong@gmail.com >>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I restarted a cluster with 1.1 , I found >>> that >>>>>>>> hbase:meta >>>>>>>>>>>>> region >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (written to by the previously deployed 2.0) >>>> couldn't >>>>> be >>>>>>>>>> opened: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>>>>> hfile.CorruptHFileException: >>>>>>>>>> Problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HFile Trailer from file hdfs:// >>>> yz1.xx.com:8020/apps/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hbase/data/data/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hbase/meta/1588230740/info/ >>>>>>> 599fc8a37311414e876803312009a9 >>>>>>>> 86 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore. >>>>>>>> openStoreFiles( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 579) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore. >>>>>>>> loadStoreFiles( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 534) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HStore.( >>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java:275) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion. >>>>>>>> instantiateHSto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re(HRegion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:5150) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HRegion$1.call( >>>>>>>> HRegion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:912) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HRegion$1.call( >>>>>>>> HRegion. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java:909) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent. >>>>>>> FutureTask.run(FutureTask. >>>>>>>>>>>> java:266) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter. >>>> call( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Executors.java:511) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.util.concurrent. >>>>>>> FutureTask.run(FutureTask. >>>>>>>>>>>> java:266) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 3 more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>>>>>>>>>>> hfile.CorruptHFileException: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reading HFile Trailer from file hdfs:// >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yz1.xx.com:8020/apps/hbase/data/data/hbase/ >>>>>>>> meta/1588230740/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info/599fc8a37311414e876803312009a986 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>>>>>> hfile.HFile.pickReaderVersion( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HFile.java:483) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>>> hfile.HFile.createReader( >>>>>>>>>>>>> HFile.java:511) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>>> regionserver.StoreFile$Reader. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (StoreFile.java:1128) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.StoreFileInfo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> open(StoreFileInfo.java:267) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.StoreFile.open( >>>>>>>> StoreFil >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.java:409) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.StoreFile. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> createReader(StoreFile.java:517) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HStore. >>>>>>>> createStoreFileA >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ndReader( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java:687) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HStore.access$ >>>>>> 000( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java:130) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HStore$1.call( >>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java:554) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase. >>>> regionserver.HStore$1.call( >>>>>>>>>>>>> HStore.java:551) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 6 more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.io.IOException: java.lang. >>>>>>>>>>>> ClassNotFoundException: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellComparator$ >>>>>>> MetaCellComparator >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>> hfile.FixedFileTrailer. >>>>>>>> getCompara >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> torClass( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FixedFileTrailer.java:581) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>> hfile.FixedFileTrailer. >>>>>>>>>>>>> deserializeFromPB( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FixedFileTrailer.java:300) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>> hfile.FixedFileTrailer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deserialize(FixedFileTrailer.java:242) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>> hfile.FixedFileTrailer. >>>>>>>>>>>> readFromStream( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FixedFileTrailer.java:407) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>>>>>> hfile.HFile.pickReaderVersion( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HFile.java:468) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... 15 more >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.CellComparator$ >>>>>>> MetaCellComparator >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.net.URLClassLoader. >>>>>>>>>> findClass(URLClassLoader.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 381) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader. >>>>>>>> loadClass(ClassLoader.java: >>>>>>>>>> 424) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at sun.misc.Launcher$ >>>>> AppClassLoader.loadClass( >>>>>>>>>>>>> Launcher.java: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 331) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.ClassLoader. >>>>>>>> loadClass(ClassLoader.java: >>>>>>>>>> 357) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native >>> Method) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at java.lang.Class.forName(Class. >>> java:264) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io. >>> hfile.FixedFileTrailer. >>>>>>>> getCompara >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> torClass( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FixedFileTrailer.java:579) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When user does rolling upgrade from 1.1 to 2.0, >>> the >>>>>> above >>>>>>>> may >>>>>>>>>>>> cause >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if hbase:meta region is updated by server running >>>> 2.0 >>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>> later >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assigned to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a region server which still runs 1.1 (due to >>> crash >>>> of >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> server >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.0, e.g.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to get community feedback on the severity >>> of >>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>> issue. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>