Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAN5cbe5qt9EnsQ=Ypcb+EY3LOG_1jCPh2F_jizW1tYwFxOP8Bw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN5cbe4ddg-MukFscPN-SbbHUUAwBqHM8-fuo+hjwqneVG8Qrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALte62yORxaAnJcaSwsKtctn+RQEduZR7c=a5D4Q8KH5BnF3+g@mail.gmail.com> <CAN5cbe5qt9EnsQ=Ypcb+EY3LOG_1jCPh2F_jizW1tYwFxOP8Bw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:19:32 -0800
Message-ID: <CADcMMgEUv9hmgkCx21kxX9bXzxv7t3=WP9i0R+zF2rAgmtEzhA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Time for Apache HBase 1.2.5
To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11449aaa9e74a20542f0aeeb
archived-at: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 22:19:38 -0000

--001a11449aaa9e74a20542f0aeeb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:

> I have not, thanks for the heads-up.
>
> HBASE-17069 is currently not marked blocker and has no assignee.  If
> it's a blocker for 1.2.5, could the folks involved please correct
> this?
>
>
Its not marked blocker because issue is under investigation still.
HBASE-14465 has been fingered as a problematic backport but it has been in
1.2 since 1.2.0 committed more than a year ago. Seems important figuring
what is going on here -- I'm having trouble replicating -- but doesn't seem
like something to hold up a 1.2.5 for.

St.Ack


> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sean:
> > Have you looked at HBASE-17069 ?
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi folks!
> >>
> >> I'm planning to cut an RC for 1.2.5 at the end of this week. I don't
> >> see any blockers in JIRA, so please let me know if there's something
> >> that ought to stop a release.
> >>
> >> -
> >> busbey
> >>
>

--001a11449aaa9e74a20542f0aeeb--