hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: State of 1.3 first RC
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2016 15:36:48 GMT
Have committed HBASE-16960 today, FYI @Mikhail

Looking forward to the 1st RC (Smile)

Best Regards,
Yu

On 4 November 2016 at 06:09, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com> wrote:

> All rights guys, thanks for the pings and patience! Status update:
>
>  - all patches listed in the first email on the thread have been committed
>  - in addition to those following fixes will go in (good catches!)
>     * HBASE-16931 Setting cell's seqId to zero in compaction flow might
> cause RS down (committed)
>     * HBASE-16960 RegionServer hang when aborting (committed to master and
> branch-1, pending commit to branch-1.3).
>
> With that I'm planning to prepare the RC. The other patches pinged upon
> would be in 1.3.1 or 1.4.0.
> Speak up if I missed some pending fixes you consider critical.
>
> Thanks!
> -Mikhail
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking - thanks!
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Another critical one for your attention sir (patch ready for commit):
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16960
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yu
> >>
> >> On 31 October 2016 at 16:59, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Yu,
> >> >
> >> > sorry I missed that and thanks for reaching out. Let me have a look
> now
> >> and
> >> > comment on the jira.
> >> >
> >> > -Mikhail
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I think HBASE-16931 is also a critical issue (oops also in
> compaction
> >> > > area...) and should go in 1.3.0, pinged several times there but
> >> failed to
> >> > > draw your attention boss (smile). Mind take a look? Thanks.
> >> > >
> >> > > Btw, is there any ETA for 1.3.0 yet?
> >> > >
> >> > > Best Regards,
> >> > > Yu
> >> > >
> >> > > On 29 October 2016 at 08:17, Mikhail Antonov <olorinbant@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Guys,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I've been working on getting the first RC out this week and want
> to
> >> > share
> >> > > > an update on the current state of the things.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >  - HBASE-16951 - was found and fixed, when we don't include
> >> > > > hbase-archetypes in the tarball assembly
> >> > > >  - HBASE-16570 - optimization that caused a regression in the
> >> balancer,
> >> > > it
> >> > > > was reverted from 1.3. Once fixed that would go to 1.4 and perhaps
> >> > 1.3.1.
> >> > > >  - HBASE-16743 - flaky TestSimpleRpcScheduler, fixed now (I ran
> >> several
> >> > > > cycles of 50 iterations each and all have passed).
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Now, there's presently one remaining blocker - HBASE-16964, when
> we
> >> > don't
> >> > > > properly handle archiving of store files after compactions (thanks
> >> Gary
> >> > > for
> >> > > > digging into that!).
> >> > > > See the jira for details.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Also, as a note - the above is a third major bug around
> compactions
> >> > that
> >> > > we
> >> > > > saw on 1.3 during our testing last month (see also HBASE-16788
> >> > > > and HBASE-16754)..
> >> > > > So during the upcoming RC testing let's try to stress this area.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Until 1.3 is out let's consider branch-1.3 to be in a lockdown
for
> >> new
> >> > > > changes. Ping me if you think there is something that I'm missing
> >> that
> >> > > > should go out in 1.3. Otherwise,
> >> > > > important but non-blocker fixes in flight would go in 1.3.1.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Stay tuned!
> >> > > > Mikhail
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Michael Antonov
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> > Michael Antonov
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Michael Antonov
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message