hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] No regions on Master node in 2.0
Date Sat, 12 Nov 2016 17:44:57 GMT
Thanks Stack and Enis. I concur, it's hard to say for those not intimate
with the new code.

In the absence of more information, intuition says master carries meta to
avoid a whole class of problems.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks Stack for reviving this.
>
> How to move forward here? The Pv2 master is almost done. An ITBLL bakeoff
> > of new Pv2 based assign vs a Master that exclusively hosts hbase:meta?
> >
> >
> I think we have to evaluate whether the new pv2 master works with remote
> meta
> updates and the fact that those updates can fail partially or succeed
> without the
> client getting the reply, etc. Sorry it has been some time I've looked at
> the design.
> Actually what would be very good is to have a design overview / write up of
> the pv2
> in its current / final form so that we can evaluate. Last time I've looked
> there was no
> detailed design doc at all.
>
>
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message