Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE86200B9A for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 4EDD4160AE9; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BCE89160AE8 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:12:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 307 invoked by uid 500); 7 Oct 2016 17:12:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 268 invoked by uid 99); 7 Oct 2016 17:12:20 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701762C014E for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 17:12:20 +0000 (UTC) From: "yunjiong zhao (JIRA)" To: dev@hbase.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (HBASE-16790) Need a better way to handler user's coprocessor error MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 17:12:22 -0000 yunjiong zhao created HBASE-16790: ------------------------------------- Summary: Need a better way to handler user's coprocessor error Key: HBASE-16790 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16790 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: yunjiong zhao User's bad coprocessor caused our hbase cluster down few times. Now we are going to set hbase.coprocessor.abortonerror to false to avoid them bring down whole cluster accidentally. But this is not encourage in production since it will cause inconsistent. Do we have better ways to handle this situation? Just few thoughts: 1. Instead of shutdown RegionServer, can we just disable the table which have coprocessor error? 2. Can we give some of user privilege to add coprocessor only? We can't just set hbase.coprocessor.user.enabled=false, that will cause lots of works to operation the cluster. 3. Can we add another step, wait for supper user approve before hbase dynamically load the coprocessor? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)