hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] First release candidate for hbase-1.1.7 (RC0) is available
Date Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:55:05 GMT
Ok, suggest fixing the changes file issue for RC1. We may have missed it in 1.1.6 but 1.1.7
should carry those left out entries. 


> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:02 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 
> -1
> 
> good:
> 
> * checksums and signatures check out
> * RAT check passed
> * source tarball corresponds to 1.1.6RC0 (which points to
> cdc799e9b7bedb6b2b2a9a3123321e010c7a6eab), ignoring HBASE-13088 and
> the issue listed below.
> * source compiles
> * LICENSE/NOTICE look okay, agree that issues Andrew mentioned are non-blockers.
> 
> not so good:
> 
> * source tarball includes binaries, namely the hbase-shaded-server and
> hbase-shaded-client modules include their target directories which
> includes generated jars. (in addition to the ASF policy issue, this
> makes the source tarball ~80MiB–compared to 15MiB for 1.1.6.) I've had
> this happen before if a clean didn't immediately precede the source
> assembly invocation.
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org> wrote:
>> +1
>> 
>> Checked sums and signatures: good
>> 
>> Checked CHANGES.txt: The release notes jump from 1.1.5 to 1.1.7. That's
>> weird. However entries for 1.1.7 are available so not a fatal problem IMHO.
>> 
>> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE files in source and binary tarballs: Mostly
>> ok. In the binary NOTICE file there are a lot of failed substitutions like
>> "For source see '${dep.url}'" but this isn't something the RM did wrong,
>> nor is only a problem for this release, and isn't a fatal problem IMHO.
>> 
>> SHA reported by binaries (cdc799e) is RC tag in git: yes
>> 
>> Built from source (7u80): ok
>> 
>> RAT check (7u80): passed
>> 
>> Unit tests (7u80): first time through, we had this:
>> 
>> Failed tests:
>>  TestHTraceHooks.testTraceCreateTable:133 expected:<2> but was:<1>
>> Tests in error:
>>  TestHRegion.testWritesWhileRollWriter » DamagedWAL Failed offering sync
>> 
>> however, when running the tests individually they passed, so these are
>> flakes, not failures.
>> 
>> Loaded 1M rows with LTT (10 readers, 10 writers, 10 updaters (20%)):
>> passed, all keys verified, no errors or unexpected messages in the logs,
>> latencies in the ballpark
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Misty Stanley-Jones <misty@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Feedback is welcome as this is my first time managing a release, on
>>> behalf of Nick Dimiduk.
>>> 
>>> The first release candidate for HBase 1.1.7 (hbase-1.1.7RC0) is
>>> available for download at:
>>> 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.1.7RC0/
>>> 
>>> Maven artifacts are also available in a staging repository at:
>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1152/
>>> 
>>> Artifacts are signed with my key (21A15DC5) published up in our KEYS
>>> file at https://www-us.apache.org/dist/hbase/KEYS.
>>> 
>>> The RC is tagged 1.1.7RC0 and represents SHA
>>> cdc799e9b7bedb6b2b2a9a3123321e010c7a6eab.
>>> 
>>> The detailed source and binary compatibility report vs 1.1.6 has been
>>> published for your review, at:
>>> 
>>> http://people.apache.org/~misty/hbase-1.1.7-compatibility/
>>> 
>>> HBase 1.1.7 is the seventh patch release in the HBase 1.1 line,
>>> continuing on
>>> the theme of bringing a stable, reliable database to the Hadoop and
>>> NoSQL
>>> communities. This release includes 16 changes and bug fixes since 1.1.6.
>>> 
>>> The full list of fixes included in this release is available at:
>>> 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>>> version=12337981&projectId=12310753
>>> 
>>> and in the CHANGES.txt file included in the distribution.
>>> 
>>> Please try out this candidate and vote +/-1 by 23:59 Pacific time on
>>> Monday, October 3, 2016 as to whether we should release these artifacts
>>> as HBase
>>> 1.1.7.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> St.Ack
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> 
>>   - Andy
>> 
>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
>> (via Tom White)
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> busbey

Mime
View raw message