hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "deepankar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Created] (HBASE-16630) Fragmentation in long running Bucket Cache
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2016 01:00:40 GMT
deepankar created HBASE-16630:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Fragmentation in long running Bucket Cache
                 Key: HBASE-16630
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16630
             Project: HBase
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: BucketCache
    Affects Versions: 1.2.3, 1.1.6, 2.0.0, 1.3.1
            Reporter: deepankar
            Assignee: deepankar


As we are running bucket cache for a long time in our system, we are observing cases where
some nodes after some time does not fully utilize the bucket cache, in some cases it is even
worse in the sense they get stuck at a value < 0.25 % of the bucket cache (DEFAULT_MEMORY_FACTOR
as all our tables are configured in-memory for simplicity sake).

We took a heap dump and analyzed what is happening and saw that is classic case of fragmentation,
current implementation of BucketCache (mainly BucketAllocator) relies on the logic that fullyFreeBuckets
are available for switching/adjusting cache usage between different bucketSizes . But once
a compaction / bulkload happens and the blocks are evicted from a bucket size , these are
usually evicted from random places of the buckets of a bucketSize and thus locking the number
of buckets associated with a bucketSize and in the worst case of the fragmentation we have
seen some bucketSizes with occupancy ratio of <  10 % But they dont have any completelyFreeBuckets
to share with the other bucketSize. 

Currently the existing eviction logic helps in the cases where cache used is more the MEMORY_FACTOR
or MULTI_FACTOR and once those evictions are also done, the eviction (freeSpace function)
will not evict anything and the cache utilization will be stuck at that value without any
allocations for other required sizes.

The fix for this we came up with is simple that we do deFragmentation ( compaction) of the
bucketSize and thus increasing the occupancy ratio and also freeing up the buckets to be fullyFree,
this logic itself is not complicated as the bucketAllocator takes care of packing the blocks
in the buckets, we need evict and re-allocate the blocks for all the BucketSizes that dont
fit the criteria.

I am attaching an initial patch just to give an idea of what we are thinking and I'll improve
it based on the comments from the community.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message