hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodio...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Merge Backup / Restore - Branch HBASE-7912
Date Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:42:45 GMT
Sorry, wrong links:
These are the phases:

Phase 1:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14030>14030
Phase 2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14123>14123
Phase 3:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14414>14414

-Vlad

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Vladimir Rodionov <vladrodionov@gmail.com>
wrote:

> These are the phases:
>
> Phase 1:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14030
> Phase 2:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14123
> Phase 3:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912>14414
>
> -Vlad
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> As you guys may already be familiar, Vladimir, Ted, Jerry and others have
>> been developing the backup / restore functionality in a series of issues
>> committed in the separate branch HBASE-7912[1].
>>
>> Backup / Restore functionality is tracked as a 4-phase project, and the
>> first two phases are complete and useable. We are now working on Phase 3
>> items, which are mostly improvements. We think that the current code in
>> the
>> branch containing all Phase 1 and Phase 2 items, and some Phase 3 items is
>> useable on it's own, and we do not have to wait for all the subtickets to
>> be finished to make it completely useable (as follow up tickets are mostly
>> improvements or optimizations). The improvements in the works are all
>> backwards compatible with the existing stuff. Thus, we would like to
>> propose that the branch HBASE-7912 be merged into master.  The parent jira
>> has a design doc that goes into details about the implementation and
>> design
>> choices in case you are interested[2].
>>
>> Most of the changes are largely non-intrusive and confined to the
>> backup subsystem.
>> The unit tests have been passing on manual runs and we (hortonworks) have
>> been running the integration tests as well as some other shell-based
>> system
>> tests on a forked version of the code. Most of the work has been reviewed
>> by 1, 2 or 3 committers already (mostly Ted, myself and Jerry).
>>
>> What do you guys think? Is it time to call a vote? Any concerns or
>> feedback
>> appreciated.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-7912
>> [2]
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12816339/HBaseBackupAndRestore%20-0.91.pdf
>>
>> Enis
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message