hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: HADOOP-13363
Date Sat, 09 Jul 2016 20:01:38 GMT
PB3 sounds like a plan for 2.0 but what about all shipping versions.


On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> The plan in HBASE-15638 is to shade our protobuf so we are independent of
> anyone else's protobuf and so we can move on to one of our choosing or even
> check in our own protobuf if we have to (protobuf is lacking in support for
> offheap). Anoop and Ram are thinking we should go to pb3. I'll let them
> talk of the testing they have done so far.
>
> St.Ack
>
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > We should look at HBASE-15638 again in light of HADOOP-13363.
> > ​​
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >    - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message