Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE25F200B33 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:20:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CCB2E160A6E; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 217C5160A3C for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:20:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 12083 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2016 21:20:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 12070 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2016 21:20:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6C6221A7617 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.198 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28VQYJsyX2LH for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 25FCA5F1E5 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id xn17so44352502obc.0 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:20:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=g5ldJkZRekKcd7ST3tupBKJa7N8r56+jbT7H3386XxY=; b=O4gHP0tw1xK5ougoFq/vrRfUu2JQofm+OpR9QT3NRsj65zxN+13hP2MjQbTrR6WD9Q g+Zg6zfABItVymw2DSvXUcW5i1PgEBUElfB2AI7TeNm/PrVbDNtrSFSNpvqKz8vlZ7rd pM9BNyr/nxKyKX8F3BuK6IZ6JLqT8W/zWoI+OdtL4nkEgWk6d+Stqx1+giaCYdTrYCfa d3qPv961Pi6eAnyBHHimFMIvyssmZtPw2LHTKaS1T8AW7fQg5oviEaFr93fgubne5DVs bkOiSC5h//Rjuhkh5fdSsaoZ/xarxsKwqnNzz7zaC6L1SHCidwZDzQ4ilj6VTiH8k8pq IaBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=g5ldJkZRekKcd7ST3tupBKJa7N8r56+jbT7H3386XxY=; b=CyqE3XnsrRkScZjFRKi2aloB3ES05NHcHuZ9z36kNUDGqa+IWbFEjIpq7El761BR1v ma3rgezb91gwiljOBuJpzwqy79e5Kc8wyBaeWpJ97YFUTl91WwG7QwecQqP84PIvAokm Z7buwg0q/y8YaSg/W9zU5oUIEZMqN8ZZfK2EFchpwsLRfe1n02jZKdtssk5GCZqukBAj sFZp+O0okuZ6lxGu3mASeVBz5TGWtWc4/hLmLZRLaZNZM3RagwUqLa4mfOR5/9VT0ksw 3bxn5qw0iKoCzcO+nM6w3tf6KuKVGqMMR3VbWuANT8zYj75T9ncAEFTaQ5tGaQEmu9Kk fjqQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKiXAQaBsjPTELrlUkFRPvDCXqAvPmjMl95dp/JGryK+L7KZ8p6cSFsx2eF1xsbXY5PMS9bCzMf6gzwPw== X-Received: by 10.202.45.74 with SMTP id t71mr6469595oit.103.1467235237938; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:20:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.212.149 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:20:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mikhail Antonov Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 14:20:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] issue trackers and recent stability of issues.apache/jira To: "dev@hbase.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137a4a028cadc0536715304 archived-at: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 21:20:43 -0000 --001a1137a4a028cadc0536715304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Anyone knows ASF Infra / ASF Board position on it? Why is ASF jira not stable enough - is it matter or insufficient hardware, no people supporting it or ...? I probably missed some discussions around this matter in the past. -Mikhail On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > JIRA identifiers in commits are essential for just about everything I do > with HBase release management, maintenance, and operational support. I'm > not opposed to switching to something else but then our backstory is split > over (at least) two sources, without ease of cross-linking references. > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Heya folks, > > > > ASF hosted JIRA has had a rough go of things over the last few months. > > Between the spam attacks impacting both availability and our usage > > patterns and whatever has been causing the brown outs over the last > > two days, things are impacting at least _my_ ability to make use of > > the time I have available for the project. > > > > There are other options available to us as a project; no ASF policy > > requires us to use any particular issue tracker or even an ASF hosted > > issue tracker at all. > > > > Before I go through the effort to figure out what our requirements > > would be for a third party solutions (in terms of user load, > > persistence of messages, etc), what's our community temperature on > > this issue? Do we have the stomach for a transition? > > > > - > > busbey > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Thanks, Michael Antonov --001a1137a4a028cadc0536715304--