Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE8A200B29 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:38:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3D871160A52; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 84B29160A51 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:38:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 13058 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2016 12:38:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 13043 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2016 12:38:26 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:26 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E2E4F1A777E for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAixiW3Q6LVX for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6371B5F4E3 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id r201so116764890wme.1 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:38:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G4b5dSmynit+yTGTdytRuwXRtGBoXSJba4lLPVPv0oc=; b=kOWVRG1bMTS1aVaoagWvvwr56qjK3nSvRKYX12whNq7c5JenJVDNTWRrltVEiX5lBk nusUFVFHzfi/ET06xSQanmE8sufH8/okXo5WQIEu2cro4d5cNiuqmGkhf/ZjkHxlfoQy mmYYoGUMZAIDyKlcdoe3Kf++5CBurFtxOkAX/coVu8iDJPnP7bxDyWbf8fvEBV7bB5KL +2kc6lplowGH+cLAELxU0WkRic7JDI+8SK9FjDz5IwXFDGP+7Kfg2KL6aETfcCDm9t3Y 1aDreSrFPkUXgtEaccmfmwVxE3atm5LgVpQzNVwsI3kUEK4ywETxcn+3yPhEMed5UpAX KJTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=G4b5dSmynit+yTGTdytRuwXRtGBoXSJba4lLPVPv0oc=; b=flACRV+Kn3Yvz/QkjkOzUWy9ZOl1mB3JEf1E4IEr0BZWiAMxXz/bqwe3GFzcyI39tS mbGSl1BSPbtDcZLwIntjrz3kCmyhpHaGGbDV9/skHIKR6/iquA5mth3C5nUuv/NzFGI7 RWCLf/Qi2bHuwN7N4PlT0kZUqqkLqTDzO2mC9Dj5WAn4g3Wvu/RzDPHQfs/BRAdE6aEX SCPh7uvpBVXTxQuCL3XLxSVZfIPy9Vr9wmOMqJrsYRF9cPiMgDAUIFv1nq5TyQpQbhZY FKY7AXE52278tBkMq1jr4Pe6DDiJpUsOzbfwUTYdwk3YznhNqD4mB8zgHcj8/lR+H+aT Tejg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJgHbJdIlSajElZ3Yv3QbEchop/F52O6RRODc54wBjXntq695p1iftzXOC6B5oJJUV/J+zk6a+7Yvorrw== X-Received: by 10.28.157.1 with SMTP id g1mr27654357wme.34.1467290302541; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:38:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.230.150 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 05:37:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Lars Francke Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] issue trackers and recent stability of issues.apache/jira To: dev@hbase.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114ba76c43f6c105367e257c archived-at: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:38:33 -0000 --001a114ba76c43f6c105367e257c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 JIRA is not always stable and that sucks but the cost of moving to a different tool would be fairly high because lots of workflows we know about (and probably more we don't) rely on JIRA (including my own). I'd be -0 on changing especially if the issues can and will be resolved at some point in the future. On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > JIRA identifiers in commits are essential for just about everything I do > with HBase release management, maintenance, and operational support. I'm > not opposed to switching to something else but then our backstory is split > over (at least) two sources, without ease of cross-linking references. > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Sean Busbey wrote: > > > Heya folks, > > > > ASF hosted JIRA has had a rough go of things over the last few months. > > Between the spam attacks impacting both availability and our usage > > patterns and whatever has been causing the brown outs over the last > > two days, things are impacting at least _my_ ability to make use of > > the time I have available for the project. > > > > There are other options available to us as a project; no ASF policy > > requires us to use any particular issue tracker or even an ASF hosted > > issue tracker at all. > > > > Before I go through the effort to figure out what our requirements > > would be for a third party solutions (in terms of user load, > > persistence of messages, etc), what's our community temperature on > > this issue? Do we have the stomach for a transition? > > > > - > > busbey > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > --001a114ba76c43f6c105367e257c--