hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.20 release candidate (RC0) is available
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2016 17:03:20 GMT
Thanks Dima. Really appreciate you taking the time to subject it to ITBLL.


On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Dima Spivak <dspivak@cloudera.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> - Deployed onto a 5-node container cluster from binary tarball (with Hadoop
> 2.2; thanks, Andy :-p)l. Did some sanity checks of the HBase shell and web
> UI, all looks good.
> - Ran IntegrationTestBigLinkedList in loop mode with 1 billion nodes;
> passed without a problem.
>
> -Dima
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Ran unit test suite with Java 1.7.0_67
> > Exercised some basic shell commands
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I've not seen this Dima but note that 0.98 releases have always built
> > their
> > > binary convenience artifacts against Hadoop 2.2.0. When evaluating the
> > > convenience artifacts, please use this version or do a proper rebuild
> > from
> > > source if using a later Hadoop and let me know if you're still seeing
> > this
> > > linkage error somehow.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Dima Spivak <dspivak@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is anyone else having problems running ITBLL against this build?
> Using
> > > > clusterdock (HBASE-12721), I created images with this RC, Hadoop
> 2.5.2,
> > > and
> > > > Java 7u79, but when I run hbase
> > > > org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList loop 1 4
> > > > 250000000 mytmpdir 4, the test errors out after the Random Input
> > > Generation
> > > > MapReduce job completes successfully complaining about a missing enum
> > > > constant (org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.JobCounter.MB_MILLIS_MAPS). For
> > > what
> > > > it’s worth, this is the first time I’ve tried to run a cluster this
> way
> > > > against the 0.98 branch, so not faulting this specific RC, but
> figured
> > > I’d
> > > > surface it. Full log is up on Gist
> > > > <https://gist.github.com/dimaspivak/bbafd36c707472b10c86f466e4b4e530
> >.
> > > >
> > > > -Dima
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurtell@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.20 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> > download
> > > > at
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/0.98.20RC0/ and Maven
> > > > > artifacts are also available in the temporary repository
> > > > >
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1137/
> > > > .
> > > > >
> > > > > The detailed source and binary compatibility report for this
> release
> > > with
> > > > > respect to the previous is available for your review at
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/0.98.20RC0/0.98.19_0.98.20RC0_compat_report.html
> > > > > . There are no reported problems or warnings.
> > > > >
> > > > > The 41 issues resolved in this release can be found at
> > > > > https://s.apache.org/5f48 .
> > > > >
> > > > > I have made the following preliminary assessments of this
> candidate:
> > > > > - Build with source artifact with RAT and enforcers enabled
> > (-Prelease)
> > > > > completes successfully
> > > > > - Unit test suite passes (7u79)
> > > > > - Loaded 1M rows with LTT (10 readers, 10 writers, ​10 updaters
@
> > > ​20%),
> > > > > nothing unusual logged,​ all keys verified,​ reported latencies
in
> > the
> > > > > ballpark
> > > > > - Built and ran unit tests with head of Apache Phoenix
> 4.x-HBase-0.98
> > > > > branch, looks good (7u79)
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed with my ***former, now renewed*** code signing key D5365CCD.
> > You
> > > > may
> > > > > need to refetch it.
> > > > >
> > > > >     pub   4096R/D5365CCD 2013-12-19 [expires: 2018-05-20]
> > > > >     uid                  Andrew Purtell (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> > > > > apurtell@apache.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > Apologies for the churn on signing key.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. This vote will be
> open
> > > for
> > > > > at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will try to close it Monday
> > June
> > > > 12,
> > > > > 2016 if we have sufficient votes. That is 4 working days from now.
> > > Three
> > > > +1
> > > > > votes from PMC will be required to release.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >    - Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > > Hein
> > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > >    - Andy
> > >
> > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > (via Tom White)
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Best regards,

   - Andy

Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message