Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF1C2009F3 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:44:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id CA9F6160A2A; Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E15E160A25 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 00:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 80170 invoked by uid 500); 20 May 2016 22:44:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 80157 invoked by uid 99); 20 May 2016 22:44:21 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 62A18C0D82 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.279 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.279 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpipgnSvnoPV for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id F128B5F295 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n129so2434019wmn.1 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:44:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudera-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3NoGErlFjNa5jEsoZNN0mWQ+NEAfoOIivLi5tt2Z2uY=; b=DDEP8Wmf2kp7ZGtvHa9VSpdBng9ech+pvAMBlcHT2AiPoUQ7bnRqkGhEU4DUBxo2P8 +irgEJiVZ9hbpodcOih/Hhtb+YA59RtU0ZPDZ0pwzQjJDY8GHmzfUG/7ROmWfD6o0ed9 vtNLpPVOrmM9kOjD14OIkf8YkxcV42vPc3Jt1EmPfDuqn7QxZ3IfStt3gqLK8y+4ulI8 HvaBqTxNmR1p8CpvBMdCD2G7cd8HOMh4oHFcXRAeq9BWVDEyTCs0CQ6U8ZlbPwPecngK nWwcUUwb9X08YC0iL1R3mmneI/C++a7P5qRUFxMDEXsKhH2hcSyaEgPrCIYAj5qHI6XO N2bA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=3NoGErlFjNa5jEsoZNN0mWQ+NEAfoOIivLi5tt2Z2uY=; b=RqC3a7jB8yURC8e3quBpXDUH0Dq320tm4M4H6IIRIJElbHYnIJ5EWnZGl8lzWf7Dva Evn1r6OKbAUGz+UZi2MkSgfsLb2dqryBRD6sDwTPXwuHn/63f6/5ueIiO1QLMpo9Sy5H XDMsMNHrTYzYWjMYxjS4KcJ1ioiKDFZZi3/G2xXnzGZecURwJx5i24I++O2RccxKEAxc deB2ZF1Kl1DP0LVPs7FfVNu9Lw4ehvHxUfLWusuASruurvsQtRY04oMdGPtQOaCdHRla FseaHUGXSoDVL4D05BTKqMhBEnmSvAWmGIEmpqQ7hKx/LiEfAkaBKiyODIvFulTGhvqS K1iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWWZOTARcJb/GzptQrIi0USk6xRGaL6FHkKdgcFCQ3hj6m+1yumm1uvwUTCuZV0+Ua/jFvjSlRU93ePvYm+ X-Received: by 10.194.100.129 with SMTP id ey1mr5584574wjb.26.1463784258614; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:44:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.99.3 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2016 15:43:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Todd Lipcon Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 15:43:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Smart Flaky Handler To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f647427c364fe05334dd4cf archived-at: Fri, 20 May 2016 22:44:24 -0000 --e89a8f647427c364fe05334dd4cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Matteo Bertozzi wrote: > any suggestion on how to make people aware of the tests being flaky? > You guys might consider doing something like what we do for Apache Kudu (incubating): http://dist-test.cloudera.org:8080/ has a dashboard (driven from our flaky-tests job) which shows the percent flakiness of each test, as well as a breakdown of pass/fail rates by revision. We don't automatically email these to the list or anything, currently, but would be pretty easy to set up a cron job to do so. The dashboard is very helpful for prioritizing the de-flaking of the worst offenders, and also useful to quickly drill down and grab failure logs from the flaky tests themselves. -Todd -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera --e89a8f647427c364fe05334dd4cf--