Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAD711980A for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9953 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2016 06:21:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hbase-dev-archive@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9866 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2016 06:21:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hbase.apache.org Received: (qmail 9853 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2016 06:21:27 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:21:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5CE45C2249 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:21:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.102 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=hashmapinc.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQWs5aF3dwF5 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:21:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.25.95]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id AE0585F243 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 06:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26294 invoked by uid 0); 19 Apr 2016 06:21:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2016 06:21:21 -0000 Received: from box3073.bluehost.com ([162.144.28.165]) by cmgw3 with id kDME1s00C3Zkbka01DMHQ1; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 07:21:18 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Maz/5fPf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=QBf5ySYSXTYCgxiqkAsp8Q==:117 a=QBf5ySYSXTYCgxiqkAsp8Q==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ovtOQDebDaQA:10 a=3IGgLnE2d7MA:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=5inblU87AAAA:8 a=AE3vCO9smFze-fOZj_8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ps5H3koK6C4A:10 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hashmapinc.com; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type: Mime-version:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:CC:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=YZswCDPnmx4H3Gg6mHrAet7bBa71XUCqCc4rfOGV2MQ=; b=Ll9HgxV0fH/ifTYU77b+n7kMyX 7bBHMf7X3WIzQeTSURdKrMcmTYl35ZP7fDzCy/20ni3uFxyXPhFQ2r8/xQ659t7GMnFFUlbqIC7d/ wZVO4RnIVw8jY+GYwxGFk5ESi; Received: from [24.241.58.62] (port=52060 helo=[192.167.100.1]) by box3073.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1asP2D-0005e8-HJ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 00:21:17 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160109 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:21:07 -0400 Subject: Re: What's going on? Two C++ clients being developed at the moment? From: Priyadharshini Karthikeyan To: CC: Elliott Clark Message-ID: Thread-Topic: What's going on? Two C++ clients being developed at the moment? References: <1461023844590.94490@hortonworks.com> <5ab83ca3df3b668b7348c0f27a390ef7@hashmapinc.com> In-Reply-To: <5ab83ca3df3b668b7348c0f27a390ef7@hashmapinc.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1133:box3073.bluehost.com:hashmapi:hashmapinc.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.241.58.62 authed with priya.darshini@hashmapinc.com} Will address this at the earliest.. On 4/19/16, 1:59 AM, "vamsi@hashmapinc.com" wrote: >>There's GNU licensed code. GNU is specifically called out as not being able >>to be in our repos. >>None of these are addressed and to be honest they scare me. We can move >>fast and import code that's not 100% working or tested. But playing fast >>and loose with laws is just another thing entirely. >