Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hbase.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hbase.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAM7-19+sc6DGQEfyfM7tSRF2+r5XjWZ5U-LTyz+VNsp4KfWKpA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADcMMgHr7jkvforo+ETzf+CF4DHtGWzu35EWGBFagn8GOp5COw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGHyZ6Lr1A55YhHdsMwiMjEXyDRwBRZL8X3p6AVY49unByTSYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgGg8RBnLDmSY5sfDqnQdESd9OWz6NhvNi7otng7O0_gGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAN5cbe4268Fq750j1Tiqman8rnZSntgBfWh2wRd6qbYdCY0n7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADcMMgE_z61085JYyUCUFKoO_WyAaD6nUFVQtWnhNxcukMd07A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM7-19+sc6DGQEfyfM7tSRF2+r5XjWZ5U-LTyz+VNsp4KfWKpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:26:04 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CADcMMgETmBNu__8URSN+QzZv+Oy-_e1=QoY+CEu_gDjLbpRibQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] hbase-2.0.x requires jdk8
From: Stack <stack@duboce.net>
To: HBase Dev List <dev@hbase.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1136fcbc09cd59053014cc37

--001a1136fcbc09cd59053014cc37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks all for chiming in. I filed HBASE-15624 Move master
branch/hbase-2.0.0 to jdk-8 only to act on the decision made here.

St.Ack

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Yu Li <carp84@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
> On 9 April 2016 at 02:13, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YETUS-369 (though I hate
> > filing stuff w/o putting up a patch... maybe I'll get to doing one!)
> > St.Ack
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Sean Busbey <busbey@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think there's an issue yet.
> > > On Apr 8, 2016 00:12, "Stack" <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is there a YETUS issue for this Sean or should I file one?
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Sean Busbey <busbey@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > we'll need to get a feature into yetus that can change multijdk
> > > > > settings by branch, presuming that change will result in us either
> > > > > taking on jdk8-only dependencies or direct use of jdk8-only
> features.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:18 PM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> > > > > > Any objection?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > jdk7 is dead, EOL'd.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You all good w/ this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > St.Ack
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > busbey
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--001a1136fcbc09cd59053014cc37--