hbase-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Any objection to saying HBase 1.2.0 is not supported on versions < hadoop-2.4.x?
Date Fri, 08 Apr 2016 22:15:41 GMT
+1. We have to move forward.

Enis

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimiduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm good with it, though I'll also ask the question if there's anything
> > goofy to be aware of re: HBase as someone upgrades their Hadoop? Probably
> > nothing, but I've been surprised before; would be good to leave some
> > breadcrumbs in our book.
> >
> >
> I don't know myself (If anyone does, please shout and I'll stick the hurdle
> into the doc).
> Thanks Nick,
> St.Ack
>
>
>
> > On Thursday, April 7, 2016, Stack <stack@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Currently 1.2.x is marked as NT -- i.e. not tested -- on hadoop-2.3.x
> or
> > > less. I am advocating we change the NT to X: i.e. NOT supported.
> > >
> > > You all good w/ that?
> > >
> > > St.Ack
> > > P.S. Motivation is relatively minor, see HBASE-15550, but no harm in
> > > letting go of old hadoops.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message